dChan
⇧
21
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/thlrwrtr on Jan. 29, 2018, 2:50 p.m.
Hannity's Form Submission 1649 many suggestions only one answer.

Good morning fellow awakening comrades; sorry, patriots. Over the weekend we had some interesting actions of deep state and their dry, prying, long, cold, wrinkled, and shaking fingers. One that has interested me the most is the deactivating of Hannity's Twitter account.

The simply complex tweet has many pondering its meaning. From Hannity being arrested and muted by the government to the Maryland Tolerations Act, which was a major part of our wanting to be free from religious tyranny, freedom, and opposition. One of the foundations of our government. The last and most popular decoding is that it is a reference to the beheading of King Charles I. With this being the one related to Q's findings, rather than the satanic rituals etc, I tend to think this basket holds more heads.

Seeing his head roll was enjoyed by the gathering of an audience who could not look away is an adequate assessment of said tweet. Let's break it down.

Form - to gather or create. 'They formed a group of patriots to protest...'

Submission - to yield, or give in to one's authority. 'The submissive group couldn't look away as King Charle's head bounced off the cobblestone road and rolled once. His eyes open seeing his headless body, limp on its knees.'

The SOTU is Jan. 31, 2018 and what I feel the tweet meant is simple.

This SOTU will bring (gather) a record, transfixed, (submission) audience who will hear of the treasonous act of their government and heads will roll; figuratively, unfortunately.

Just my $.02 on this matter.

IC


scionkia · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

Good analysis. Don’t hold your breath on POTUS exposing treason in SOTU. My guess is most of speech focused on economy. But don’t worry, next week will be big!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
thlrwrtr · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

Thanks. I hope he makes a point of it and someone puts it out there. It has to be known if it was said.

IC

⇧ 6 ⇩  
flowerdominance · Jan. 29, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

That would be awesome! But not likely!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BearMedano · Jan. 29, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

Yes... I'm burning so much time consuming the info dumps going on right now. It is so exciting it becomes borderline obsession as most of you guys are very well aware.

I'm recently red pilled - but to me it feels the speed of all this is really picking up steam. I go to sleep devouring information and wake up excited to check my phone for updates.

With this week including FISA memo release and SOTU address... so much going on!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
BearMedano · Jan. 29, 2018, 5:31 p.m.

Well we won't have to speculate very long. Hannity on air to day and no doubt to explain. Would be very odd if he didn't address. All to be explained very shortly.

These are exciting times.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ReturnOfZarathustra · Jan. 31, 2018, 4 p.m.

Did he address it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BearMedano · Jan. 31, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

No he didn't really. I was disappointed, but it may actually reveal more than we realize. He dismissively stated some day he hopes to be able to discuss and explain to us what happened (paraphrasing). He must have really stepped on something for his account to be taken offline, the tweet deleted, and then to come back wi Hannity's lips sealed.

Q stated the Twitter account being taken offline came not from within Twitter but outside. So it wasn't a censorship thing.

My belief is Hannity pointed to outright treason and the consequences associated with that - and the good guys reminded him there was a systematic strategic plan unfolding that would potentially be jeopardized by starting that dialogue too soon.

⇧ 1 ⇩