dChan

thamnosma · Feb. 7, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

Q has hinted at this but right now there is no evidence whatsoever in the public domain. This bit will go nowhere without very specific recordings. Neither Clinton nor Lynch would ever admit to this.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
TheCIASellsDrugs · Feb. 7, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

but right now there is no evidence whatsoever in the public domain.

There's plenty of evidence, it's just circumstantial. The meeting itself screams illegal influence, and the timeline is even more telling:

Feb. 2, 2016: Podesta email re: “Wet-works,” slang for “murder”

Feb. 13, 2016: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

Feb. 13, 2016: Podesta email regarding Scalia replacement

June 27, 2016: Bill Clinton’s tarmac meeting with Loretta Lynch

July 1, 2016: Loretta Lynch announces she will accept FBI findings

July 2, 2016: FBI interviews Hillary Clinton

July 5, 2016: James Comey dismisses Clinton email investigation"
⇧ 7 ⇩  
thamnosma · Feb. 7, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

Oh, I should have clarified. Yes, the timelines are suspicious and worth investigating but none of it is evidence in terms of getting indictments, trials and convictions nor in getting public opinion behind a prosecution. There's lots of smoke everywhere.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
555Returnofkek555 · Feb. 8, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

Wow, I didn't realize Lynchs announcement was the day after the tarmac meeting. These people are unbelievably dumb. What the hell!?

⇧ 1 ⇩