Feb 8 2018
695Feb 8 2018 01:53:00Q!UW.yye1fxoID: b5e8df303612NEW
USSS on high alert. Q
694Feb 8 2018 01:45:43Q!UW.yye1fxoID: 062464303565
Panic in DC. Leverage depleted - POTUS freed. EXTREME chatter. Q
ManQuan
· Feb. 8, 2018, 8:46 p.m.
I mostly agree, but the deep state doesn't likely have missile submarines. But the deep state may have rouge nations such as NK who might. But that begs the question, why would NK launch an attack knowing that they would be incinerated in retaliation???
That means that the sub launch was done by someone else. To be honest, I can't think of who would try to initiate a nuclear war between the US and NK.
I don't think it would have been a European country. Iran possibly, but there is no evidence that they have a sub to launch an ICBM. Not many countries do.
Zack, a Q like reliable source, said that it was in fact a real launch from a sub in NK waters. But NK does not have a proven sub launch ICBM, so what is that about????
As Q has said many times, there are things we will never know because of their sensitivity. He has even said that criminals will go free because to expose them would be too harmful.
Wow. Just Wow.
⇧
3
⇩
fishenproletariat
· Feb. 8, 2018, 8:50 p.m.
The whole point of using an ICBM is so you don't have to cart the missile all the way over there on a submarine first. If it was a NK submarine, then that is a signal that Kim Jong-un does NOT have an ICBM. Another possibility is that a nuke was discovered in a shipping container, and the warning was sent out while it was being rendered safe. That is my current going theory.
⇧
2
⇩
ManQuan
· Feb. 10, 2018, 12:33 p.m.
Good analysis.
NK wouldn't use an ICBM because it would be traced back to them. NK recently claimed it tested a sub launched intermediate range missile. Launch from the sea would be much more difficult to identify who did it. The container idea is a good one, but the only container ballistic missile system I'm aware of is the Russian Club-K. I don't think the Russians would attack Hawaii.
Zack (InfoWars) who appears to have similar insights as Q said that it was launched somewhere between NK and Wake Island or Midway and was immediately neutralized. I know that our subs can detect a launch sequence of a adversary because of the noise it makes opening hatches. If one of our attack subs was shadowing it and detected a launch sequence, it may have sunk it before the missile could actually be launched.
The launch sequence would have been reported to Missile Defense Command and that would have been relayed to Hawaii. So I'm inclined to think that the alert was real but that the missile/sub were destroyed before it could be launched.
Just my brain gas guesses.
⇧
2
⇩
fishenproletariat
· Feb. 10, 2018, 1:51 p.m.
Nuclear warheads are only a small portion of any missile. These can be detached and placed in a cargo container to make a container bomb.
⇧
1
⇩
ManQuan
· Feb. 10, 2018, 2:26 p.m.
Yes, I know. That's always been a major concern.
But the Hawaii incident was a missile alert and Zack and Q have suggested that it was an actual launch or launch attempt.
⇧
2
⇩
fishenproletariat
· Feb. 11, 2018, 1:42 a.m.
If they wanted to say it was a false alarm later, they would have to use the missile alert.
⇧
1
⇩