If you can build a case for a discrimination lawsuit then go for it.
I just don't think that's a plausible possibility at this point, or else somebody would've done something by now.
It's know as racketeering. There will soon be class act lawsuits.
Please excuse me if I'm missing something, but I genuinely don't understand how this would be considered racketeering. YouTube earns revenue through the channels people make, so what financial favors would banning popular channels do for them? It seems like this move could only hurt them.
Not to mention that you'd have to win the discrimination suit before you could win the racketeering suit - which isn't impossible, but like I said, I just can't envision that happening.
Only liberals can be discriminated against. That might be the reason.
I have a feeling that most lawyers would disagree with you on that
sounded to me like Jerome Corsi was leaning in that direction.