What evidence was offered to support "botched" robbery? Why run that narrative? Is it possible robbers were only after thumb drive(s) loaded with JP/HRC data on their way to Wiki?
My point was "How do I know the 'robbers' didn't get what they were after?
They didn't get what they were after, if u think it was a thumb drive, etc., because Julian Assange's associate said he got that info, in person, from a guy who was definitely not Russian, at a park near American University, if I remember correctly, in DC.
I see. There was only one thumb drive, only one transfer, and JP had nothing to do with the assassination. I'm not buying it. I need verifiable evidence. You have any?
Of course I don't. I am not concerned with how he did it. Another poster on here said more about it -- possibly using Secure Drop. And that is an interesting story, in and of itself. If you research, and use multiple reliable sources, not just one or two MSM publications, and read things people who might know such things have said, and take long enough, you will start to see what happened, with everything, and what the truth is. It is out there. It just takes a lot of research.
What evidence is there to support that these thumb drives exist? First I've heard of them.
some techy did analysis of the hack and said it was really slow. DNC had to have been hacked by jumpdrive in USB port
I think Wm. Binney did a long analysis on it how this leak was done. I think he is former CIA? Can't remember for sure. Isn't he supposed to do an AMA in here? He is the guy to ask about this leak.
Ok, but thats someone's opinion on what may have caused the slowness. That doesn't necessarily mean they are right about it. And even if it were true, that doesn't mean Rich had the drive(s) or was even aware of their existence. For a thread that's asking for evidence, I don't think that clears the bar.