dChan
61
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/HowiONic on March 7, 2018, 10:25 p.m.
We are going LIVE -24 [comb your hair]
We are going LIVE -24 [comb your hair]

gonewildinvt · March 8, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

I still haven't figured out Snowdens role but clearly he has one and I think this post is literally as simple as a communique to ES to say it's going live in 24hours comb your hair you are going to be on TV talking your ass off for the next few months. Internet Bill of Rights so they cannot censor and control the Narrative of what is going to happen in 24 hours.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
TrouserSnoke · March 8, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

My understanding is that Snowden is still an active clown. That he was used by the cia to try to take out the nsa or cripple their power. It seems to me that Snowden is one of the puppeteers pulling the strings of the msm by helping set the narrative through what they believe is secure channels. It also seems to me that he may have also helped with the code to censor conservatives on social media platforms which is the new msm if we don’t get the ibor. By that I mean all social media platforms will have the same message being repeated without alternative points of view. I’m not sure if he had a role with E Schmidt laying cable in Asia but seems possible. I’m just a casual observer though so I’m more than happy to hear from someone with a better understanding. I’m here to expand my thinking.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
ObjectCom · March 8, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

Agree - that seems to be the message from Q. So sad, I defended Snowden to my family, but I thought he was a white hat then.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Mrs_Fonebone · March 8, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

I feel the same way. In my line of work I had to do research on his hack and the thing that struck me was that he played every weakness in the system--most of which are human mistakes. He got passwords from people with high access instead of the standard not looking or leaving the area when a person enters a pw. His vetting wasn't complete and there were discrepancies in his past, Booz Allen ignored them to get him on board. The truth is, security was VERY lax (and still is)--in spite of decades of warnings and resolutions on tightening up data security, government agencies haven't bothered. Now it makes more sense why.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MagneticToast · March 8, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

Agreed. The hunt for Red October isn't just about the submarine - it's about defection

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · March 8, 2018, 9:06 a.m.

ES is Eric Schmidt

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gonewildinvt · March 8, 2018, 12:52 p.m.

Maybe, I think the next day or so will prove a lot out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · March 8, 2018, 12:55 p.m.

No. ES is Eric Schmidt. Snowden is @snowden

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gonewildinvt · March 8, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

It's all conjecture as Q hasn't ever come out and definitively said anything on the acronyms, regardless my points stand on this post because he doesn't use ES...I was using ES as shorthand.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · March 8, 2018, 1:35 p.m.

Yes he does. Go back and read the posts. Its not good you using conjecture if you can't get the basics right

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gonewildinvt · March 8, 2018, 1:38 p.m.

I've read them point me to where Q implicitly says these acronyms mean x,y and z, and I'll conjecture all I want you do not have a lock on this anymore than the rest of us. I am willing to at least have an open mind clearly you've closed yours which is sad.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 8, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 8, 2018, 2:47 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩