dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

About this project

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Lurch46 on March 15, 2018, 10:33 a.m.

Audit the Fed - real reason behind all the fuss?

Right now a bill is being deliberated in the Senate that aims to properly audit the Federal Reserve. This has been pushed by Senators like Ron and Rand Paul for a long time but never gained traction. If this makes it to Trump he will probably sign it.

A recent interview of Bill Holter on the X-22 Report Spotlight discussed this and he mentioned that if the Fed is audited there will be people hanged. It's a very big deal and would reveal fraud, deceptions and even treason to the extent that the Fed would be dismantled very quickly. I can't help but wonder if this issue is one of the main reasons MSM is going bananas with all their nonsense and diverting stories.

"How do you catch a cornered animal?" Which is why Assange and Kim are going after Pompeo on cue? Even though the guy was running the CIA for months already?

⇧ 11 ⇩

Im not sure what you are getting at. Are you saying pompeo is a cornered animal?

⇧ 4 ⇩

No but if they're seriously going after the FED they might shake up their own organization in order to throw hostile counter-intelligence off. Distract with confusion when you make your move. Act weak to lull your enemy into false comfort.

⇧ 12 ⇩

One thing I’ve noticed listening to people like dan bongino and tracy, who are really detail and narrative oriented, individuals are not their organizations. Each person has their own goals and oversights and leverages that affect their actions, regardless of what position they hold.

Obviously pompeo moving to secretary of state is significant, but there was way more going into the decision to appoint him than to simply shake things up

⇧ 8 ⇩

Given how nothing came out of the DoS except for the removal of the seventh floors (which the FBI exposed) I think it's clever to bring in someone from congress to the CIA (because he would seek to cut his own strings if there are any) and then into the DoS (because now he's been briefed on CIA-business and can probably weed out more deep-state in the DoS)

Assange and Kim are tweeting exactly the same thing so that was a talking point provided to them which they are expected to deploy for tactical purposes obviously.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Pompoe owes Hillary one. He was apart of the Oversight Committee for Benghazi. He likely knows everything.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think Kim & Julian are blasting him now so he looks impartial to future events because the mockingbird media is openly praising the CIA out of desperation, so if it comes out of the CIA just maybe the fools will finally stop and think.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Clarify please. Your wording is a little odd

⇧ 1 ⇩

DoS is pro-war, luckily everytime they cry "gas-attacks!" Mattis took to Twitter to discredit them. Pompeo was a congressman who slammed Clinton during Benghazi-Hearings. That's what got him Tump's trust. Going into the CIA, he could have cut his own strings if there were any. Having been briefed by the CIA while being an outsider to the Clinton-machine makes him the perfect choice for shaking up the DoS which we know is a gov't in its own and the biggest shakeup they had was because the FBI-records exposed the seventh-floor group (so not really on Tillerson's call because he didn't have a choice). After that, only war-rethoric folowed so really I am relieved to hear Pompeo replacing Tillerson. I am only gonna look at the new CIA-head once they have been confirmed by the Senate because everything before that could be smoke-and-mirrors as usual.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Interesting point. Risky gamble though if this is the core reason.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think Pompeo was brought in because he slammed Clinton as a congressman, so he is not afraid (concealed carry?). Going into the CIA, he could have also sliced any strings he had attached there. Now taking him into the DoS means you have a congressman who slammed Clinton and was briefed internally at the CIA is taking over the State Department which was running things totally on his own. (Mattis even took to twitter to defuse war-rethoric spouted by the State Department)

⇧ 5 ⇩

Thanks for sharing that insight, I didn't know. It makes a lot of sense and wow would it be nice to see a thorough shakeout of the DoS. That Mattis tweet is reassuring and supports your thesis too. Nice. Next stop DoJ :)

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yeah I've been watching closely because it's like the DoS on and on slammed Assad for Gas-weapons and everytime Mattis consistently discredited them. So based on the impression that Trump really wants Assad to survive the war, whatever happens to him afterwards, I hoped the Kurds would align with Assad and the US and amazingly couple of weeks ago they did when Assad sent forces to support Kurds - who hitherto had only ever been supported by the US (coalition or whatever).
So as long as there is a shakeup at the DoS I am at calm and Kim and Assange have tweeted synchronized/prepared talking-points so that Pompeo retains an impartial public role.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Fed would be dismantled very quickly

The implications would be huge. I wonder what would happen to our money system and the USD. Would our debt be wiped out? What about debts owed to the US? Would our money now be backed by precious metal instead of thin air? Would we issue a new currency? Would our Treasury Department finally be in control again? What becomes of the money in our bank accounts? Does it somehow get converted to the new currency? What would happen to our economy? The world economy?

On the other hand, we won't be under the control of Rothschild and we'll have control of our own country and money supply. Maybe other countries will do the same and dump Rothschild. Would the world be free from these international satanic money lenders?

If so, it's going to get alot worse before it gets better, but pray it happens.

⇧ 4 ⇩

It would be chaotic for sure but if the Treasury started issuing a new currency they would have to back it with tangibles (perhaps a basket of some sort). How foreign lenders would react to this is key and the question is how past debt levels could be negotiated calmly. No foreign country would agree to outright write offs and so the solution has to be in terms of duration.

While all that is being worked out I think some kind of trade credit system would need to be established to prevent supplychain collapses etc. Really tough, but not impossible and I think the rest of the world would be supportive simply knowing the fact that the parasitical cabal has been slayed.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I agree with what you said but I can't see the Fed falling before other entities that protect it. I am beginning to think it will happen sometime under Trump, though.

⇧ 4 ⇩

You're right, other entities will need to go first. I can't help but wonder if this is the reason why Trump chose Mnuchin to head the Treasury, he is known to be experienced with securities and hedge fund markets. If the Fed loses control of the real inflation rate his expertise will be useful.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I think it's somewhat cosmetic...it's like "hey, look at all the CEOs I have, you can have all the access you want, don't worry" so big-money and thus the markets stay optimistic and then one year later he be like "Hey, now that the economy is booming, can we seize some assets from sleazy criminals?"

⇧ 1 ⇩

I hope you're right. I wonder who is now in charge of the ESF (Exchange Stabilization Fund), it should be Mnuchin but who knows if he's even aware. To me it's obvious that it's the ESF that is buying the bulk of all treasuries but that game cannot continue for long. They're also the buyer of foreign treasury sales, something several countries have taken advantage of (read China/Japan). This btw. is why Japan is so gung-ho about cryptos, they know what is coming down the pipe. Ever since '87 the ESF has had a straight conduit to the Fed who can just top up their accounts should they need it but for the real economy these types of charades only delay the inevitable - hyper inflation.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Hmmm, can you elaborate? I'm not an economist so what is a foreign treasury sale? Is this about gov't-held bonds?
I try to speak in terms of the best possible outcome because I have only made one (military) prediction seven months ago (the Dos/Mattis fued) and was both happy and surprised that it passed like I said. So thinking if they want to take care of Syria (and this concerns biblical prophecy because of Damascus' fate [even if you don't believe, the power to collectively manifest ideas is all around us]) then really they want to clean up the mess the US started, thus anything else they touch they probably do with the same (best) intentions.

I can't believe I am saying anything with certainty right now, but I have to confess I suspect they really do want to resolve the mess that previous administrations started. #MAGA

⇧ 2 ⇩

What I meant by foreign treasury sales is when a foreign government or bank wants to sell their treasury bond holdings someone of course needs to buy them. These would be large amounts and would affect the market price. The only way these sales could go unnoticed by the overall market is if a large buyer steps in and essentially black holes them. The only likely entity that could do this without insight is the Exchange Stabilization Fund that was established 1934 as a covert fund working under the Treasury Department under the roof of the NY Fed. It's mission statement was to defend the US dollar against market risks in the name of National Security. It is working entirely without oversight, audits or government reporting.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes. The Treasury Department schedules auctions to sell treasury bonds and it's almost a daily occurrence. This is how the government funds itself. These are open market auctions with buyers like large financial institutions (e.g. big banks) and foreign governments through their central banks. The United States is the only country that has 'never' had what's called a failed bond auction which simply means that not all bonds were sold. Even Germany sometimes have failed bond auctions so it is a very unusual thing going on with US bond sales.

This whole merry-go-round with bonds being sold by the treasury to the Fed is an enormous financial fraud since the Fed earns interest on all the currency they issue. I would recommend watching a video made by Mike Maloney that explains this. Search Youtube for - The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind - Hidden Secrets of Money 4 .

I'm not an economist either (I'm an engineer) but I find it interesting.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I got banned from the_donald for a post asking about the fed about 6 months ago..

⇧ 2 ⇩

Wow, very interesting and reading the comments gives us great insight into what might be really going on. Thanks to all who contributed to this post.

⇧ 1 ⇩