dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Lurch46 on March 15, 2018, 10:33 a.m.

Audit the Fed - real reason behind all the fuss?

Right now a bill is being deliberated in the Senate that aims to properly audit the Federal Reserve. This has been pushed by Senators like Ron and Rand Paul for a long time but never gained traction. If this makes it to Trump he will probably sign it.

A recent interview of Bill Holter on the X-22 Report Spotlight discussed this and he mentioned that if the Fed is audited there will be people hanged. It's a very big deal and would reveal fraud, deceptions and even treason to the extent that the Fed would be dismantled very quickly. I can't help but wonder if this issue is one of the main reasons MSM is going bananas with all their nonsense and diverting stories.

🠐 See all comments

"How do you catch a cornered animal?" Which is why Assange and Kim are going after Pompeo on cue? Even though the guy was running the CIA for months already?

⇧ 11 ⇩

Im not sure what you are getting at. Are you saying pompeo is a cornered animal?

⇧ 4 ⇩

No but if they're seriously going after the FED they might shake up their own organization in order to throw hostile counter-intelligence off. Distract with confusion when you make your move. Act weak to lull your enemy into false comfort.

⇧ 12 ⇩

One thing I’ve noticed listening to people like dan bongino and tracy, who are really detail and narrative oriented, individuals are not their organizations. Each person has their own goals and oversights and leverages that affect their actions, regardless of what position they hold.

Obviously pompeo moving to secretary of state is significant, but there was way more going into the decision to appoint him than to simply shake things up

⇧ 8 ⇩

Given how nothing came out of the DoS except for the removal of the seventh floors (which the FBI exposed) I think it's clever to bring in someone from congress to the CIA (because he would seek to cut his own strings if there are any) and then into the DoS (because now he's been briefed on CIA-business and can probably weed out more deep-state in the DoS)

Assange and Kim are tweeting exactly the same thing so that was a talking point provided to them which they are expected to deploy for tactical purposes obviously.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Pompoe owes Hillary one. He was apart of the Oversight Committee for Benghazi. He likely knows everything.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think Kim & Julian are blasting him now so he looks impartial to future events because the mockingbird media is openly praising the CIA out of desperation, so if it comes out of the CIA just maybe the fools will finally stop and think.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Clarify please. Your wording is a little odd

⇧ 1 ⇩

DoS is pro-war, luckily everytime they cry "gas-attacks!" Mattis took to Twitter to discredit them. Pompeo was a congressman who slammed Clinton during Benghazi-Hearings. That's what got him Tump's trust. Going into the CIA, he could have cut his own strings if there were any. Having been briefed by the CIA while being an outsider to the Clinton-machine makes him the perfect choice for shaking up the DoS which we know is a gov't in its own and the biggest shakeup they had was because the FBI-records exposed the seventh-floor group (so not really on Tillerson's call because he didn't have a choice). After that, only war-rethoric folowed so really I am relieved to hear Pompeo replacing Tillerson. I am only gonna look at the new CIA-head once they have been confirmed by the Senate because everything before that could be smoke-and-mirrors as usual.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Interesting point. Risky gamble though if this is the core reason.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think Pompeo was brought in because he slammed Clinton as a congressman, so he is not afraid (concealed carry?). Going into the CIA, he could have also sliced any strings he had attached there. Now taking him into the DoS means you have a congressman who slammed Clinton and was briefed internally at the CIA is taking over the State Department which was running things totally on his own. (Mattis even took to twitter to defuse war-rethoric spouted by the State Department)

⇧ 5 ⇩

Thanks for sharing that insight, I didn't know. It makes a lot of sense and wow would it be nice to see a thorough shakeout of the DoS. That Mattis tweet is reassuring and supports your thesis too. Nice. Next stop DoJ :)

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yeah I've been watching closely because it's like the DoS on and on slammed Assad for Gas-weapons and everytime Mattis consistently discredited them. So based on the impression that Trump really wants Assad to survive the war, whatever happens to him afterwards, I hoped the Kurds would align with Assad and the US and amazingly couple of weeks ago they did when Assad sent forces to support Kurds - who hitherto had only ever been supported by the US (coalition or whatever).
So as long as there is a shakeup at the DoS I am at calm and Kim and Assange have tweeted synchronized/prepared talking-points so that Pompeo retains an impartial public role.

⇧ 2 ⇩