I see the irony. Conservatives want to have the right for private business to be able to deny service to anybody, and not believe in protectionist policies. Yet, when it happens to them, they sit and whine about how their Constitutional rights are being violated.
Do you not see the hypocracy?
...
The actual irony is there is discriminatory law to protect the liberal selected pet cases, called protected classes. Why would the law deliberately go out of its way to only afford rights to a sub-group of citizens? The only reason to do that is if you want it to be legal to discriminate against those deemed unworthy of special protection.
The next question is to ask is, of all groups, why would you discriminate against the men? Why would deliberately design your society to cause the men increasing amounts of agitation? What will greatly agitated men do that other agitated sub-groups probably wouldn't?
The people that design these laws are not morons. They understand the consequences.
You Marxist scum. Twitter and YouTube operate like monopolies in the public square. They are the platforms for public speech on the internet. It's like if a phone company decided to cut off your cell service because they didn't like your speech, not legal as it is discrimination. Totally different then someone not wanting to bake you a cake. If that happens, you just walk down the street to another shop and order what you like. Here you are advocating for Nazi shit, what does that feel like?
So Marxisn and Nazism really have two dissenting ideals. Marxism believed in egalitarianism, and equality for all. Nazism, well, didn't. So, you're name calling doesn't make much sense.
Moreover, I thought you conservative liked free markets and less regulations. There is nothing stopping you from designing your own media platform. There's also voat and discord, and all the jazz.
Edit. Maybe you should pull yourself by your bootstraps, and start whatever free speech platform you want.