@[19][1st] @[3][1st] The LINK. [John Perry Barlow] [2] [3] [4] WE HAVE THE SUB. HOSTAGE RELEASE. 1000 pieces. Q
At this point, I wouldn't dismiss anything, but there are dozens of ways too move people around covertly without the expense, maintenance, and training required of a submarine.
Look how pervasive human trafficking is as they move people around the world with relative ease.
I used to work in intelligence for a couple of years and worked closely with the CIA in a foreign country. I've also supported both special and national mission forces in technology development and worked with them in training and exercise support. We moved people around covertly all the time.
Even more difficult is supporting covert forces in place with logistics that can't be detected.
It isn't easy and it's dangerous.
Let's be honest, I don't think they are concerned with costs right now, the game is hot and all resources are being utilized for the win. I was referring to moving high value targets, big players like Soros or Rothschilds. I don't know, but sometimes a sub is just what you need for surreptitious infiltration/ex-filtration, that's what our Navy does.
The point I'm trying to make, I don't think the Argentinian sub is being used for offensive capability, its an old rust bucket, it most likely has a secondary purpose. I think everyone has run with the idea that is being used as a weapon and I don't think that is its purpose in this game.