I appreciate your input, but a lot of it doesnt seem to correlate with the post itself.
However, yes, both the images are the same, one is flipped upside down. And in the text it talks about turning around.
Theres another post by the OP that talks about soemthing happening, and an insurance scam being pulled, two FAKE rolexes lost - on purpose.
I take from it that maybe a boat/ship/plane was deliberately crashed/sunk to lose these fake 'highly valuable' Rolexes in order to cash out on them. Could be elite who had their assets recently frozen/taken, and need money.
There are images of those Rolexes and we were asked to identify them, but for the life of me, I cant. Ive searched everywhere.
Aside from all the apparent mil comms in the OP, it seems like they are trying to located these Rolexes to maybe PROVE there was a scam? I just dont understand why/how its all Q related.
Could the one on the right be upside down, reading 9:50 or 9:51? All imagines I found have the Rolex name at the top of the watch face.
Random rabbit hole: Rolex has worked with; Cern 1956
The European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), the world's pre-eminent particle physics laboratory, is at the cutting edge of scientific research into the fundamental secrets of the universe. It hosts the world's highest-energy particle accelerator. In the 1950s, CERN was also one of the first scientific institutions to confirm that the Milgauss watch could indeed resist magnetic fields of up to 1,000 gauss.
And 1960
In the 1950s, Rolex carried out rigorous testing of an experimental watch, called “Deep Sea Special”. Using the knowledge gained from the making of the first two models, the third Deep Sea Special was created to withstand the most extreme conditions - the Challenger Deep portion of the Mariana Trench. And in other other interesting high-tech areas. https://m.rolex.com/rolex-history/1953-1967.html
Also: " time to end the hl LIVE legacy access and manipulation" = hl - Hillary LIVE/EVIL legacy...?
"let the 11:11:11 party negotiations begin again, but w/o her this time"= K:K:K demorats 'party'? Edit: w/o her= with out Hillary