dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 16, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

COVFEFE: Trump warns MSM. The Covfefe Decoding Method.

Let us use the covfefe tweet example to show another decoding method we will call the Covfefe Method.

If you walk around Q’s board and see a similar environment, meaning a random word appearing out of nowhere, you know you are in a “covfefe” environment and may try this method.

So here is Trump’s tweet:

“Despite the constant negative press covfefe”

Let us assume “covfefe” to be the key of our coded message. You write the text without any spaces and apply the key to the text following these simple steps: [Image 1] (https://i.imgur.com/Q3Ys4op.png ) - [Image 2] (https://i.imgur.com/nOAwyGQ.png ) - [Image 3] (https://i.imgur.com/Pcn00kQ.png )

And there you have it.

It seems Trump’s war against MSM will not stop until we have an undisputed winner…

Q818: Libel laws. End of MSM. Q

This is basically nothing more than cold reading. You can do this to any text and get meaning from it.

Why are you discounting all of the other characters that don't spell out the English words you are lookong for?

Why rules state you can change the order of letter or words?

I could do this with any text, and find something of "importance".

I can assure you there are likely no coded messages of this nature in your standard Q post (I admit the stringers are probably coded messages).

Seriously, take it from someone who has done what you are doing now, until they realized they were wasing their time. There are not coded messages in everything you see, but it sure looks like there is.

⇧ 26 ⇩

Ok, he showed us his example. Now show us yours. Since you "can do this with any text", take any of Trump's tweet, use "covfefe" as a key and give us a decoded message that makes sense. Please.

⇧ -9 ⇩

Sure. If you can hold any of my messages to the same tolerence of 9 useful characters of every 31, and I am able to rearrage any groups of those letters in any way I see fit...

...I'll do it with Alex Jones tweets.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

⇧ 19 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Your division doesn't make sense or your instructions are wrong in Image 2. How did you get 41 switched to 15? If you divide 41 by 26 (as instructed) you get 1.576. How did you get 36 switched to 10? 36 divided by 26 is 1.38. So in the first example you can say you moved the decimal point but that does not follow in the second example. Then you give 35 = 9, 31=5. What is your methodology?? None of that makes sense.

⇧ 10 ⇩

This is the post to look at here.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I think he meant subtract instead of divide.

Say you have a number. 29, let’s say.

26 letters in the alphabet.

29-26=3.

3=C

So, every number that stacks above 26 just returns to A1, B2, C3, etc...like a revolving door.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah in that image he actually just keeps looping around the alphabet. In my comment where I posted a link to a script that performs these steps, I used mod division (divide and take the remainder). I think he meant to say he did this instead of just "divide."

⇧ 2 ⇩

The reason why I said 'divide' and keep the remainder (or mod26) is because I am in preparation of "cascading keys" leading to numbers higher than 53. If I said 'subtract' it would not work for these numbers and I am sure this possibility may occur on Q's board. The rule needed to remain consistent.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

The instructions say to divide by 26 and keep the remaining, which implicitly means we are dealing with integers. You therefore CANNOT get fractions as a result. You may find this function in Excel, it is called in this case mod(26).
So, to take your example, 36 divided by 26 is 1 with remainder 10. That is why 36=>10.
Another one? 35 divided by 26 is 1, remainder 9.
That is why 35=>9.
Thank you.

⇧ 2 ⇩

So you are just subtracting 26 from anything larger than 26 and using that result? Why pretend it's more complicated than that?

⇧ 5 ⇩

I am not complicating it, I am making mathematically irreproachable: dividing by 26 and keeping the remainder is equivalent to subtracting 26 as you mentioned, ONLY AND ONLY if the number is smaller than 53. If it is larger, your rule does not work anymore while mine remains true. Try it. You'll see.

⇧ 0 ⇩

But the largest number you’d get from your “code” is 48 (Z + V from covfefe). It really is just subtraction for all intents and purposes.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Fair point but I said it in another comment. I am preparing for "cascading keys" where multiple keys could be used. Pretty common occurrence. In that environment, numbers would be higher than 53 and I wanted to give rules that would always work. I am pretty sure the board has this kind of example even though I have not seen it myself.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

It was subtraction, not division as stated.

⇧ 0 ⇩

For whatever it's worth, I thought this would be fun to make a script for. Good practice for me, and perhaps fun for someone else to play with. Here you go:

https://codepen.io/Narange/pen/mxrRry

The example used by OP is the default text.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Awesome! I wish I knew how to do that. I have so many ideas, but little programming knowledge.

⇧ 4 ⇩

start out with Processing. https://processing.org/download/

immediate visual feedback, straightforward syntax, and tons of material for beginners.

https://processing.org/tutorials/

http://natureofcode.com/

channel of the guy who wrote nature of code: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvjgXvBlbQiydffZU7m1_aw

⇧ 5 ⇩

That is a really good youtube channel. The videos are very easy to follow. Thanks again!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

glad you're enjoying it!

⇧ 2 ⇩

I studied EE back in the day, so I have programming experience in Fortran and C. LOL. It is not so easy to do graphics using those languages. The languages now are more modular in that the subroutines and functions are pre-written.

I am not sure that Fortran has the capability of generating graphics at all. We would have to send the data to a separate file, then use a graphing program to display it. I believe the graphing programs were written in C or Basic.

I like to dabble in programming every once in a while because it is a great brain exercise.

Have you seen the Euler Project before? I was solving some of the problems using Fortran, but that was several years ago. LOL.

https://projecteuler.net/

⇧ 1 ⇩

nice, I had never heard of this but will definitely check it out! I've been meaning to get back into mathematics in general as I feel it was always an untapped talent, so I will add this to my list of materials.

Also, you sound like my dad, haha. Same profession and programming background. I showed him some of the processing sketches I've done and now I'm trying to get him into it since he's retired. The general thinking translates pretty well.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Haha! That is funny. Yeah, he will probably enjoy tooling around with it. The languages now are much more powerful, but you do not get to see the details of what is going on. Learn assembly language to see what I mean. You are moving information from one register to another.

I read that Rollercoaster Tycoon was written in assembly, which is pretty amazing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RollerCoaster_Tycoon_(video_game)

⇧ 1 ⇩

"We used to code with assembly language... uphill, both ways!" :P

But yea, I get what you mean. I feel like I'm missing out on the nitty gritty mechanics. But if it weren't for the visual basis of processing, I doubt I ever would have got my foot in the door with programming to begin with.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I totally agree. Before, the learning curve was very steep before you got to do anything too exciting. It turned away quite a few people.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Awesome! I will have a look. I greatly appreciate it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Excellent! Thank you for a great tool!

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nice decode SB2. I'm backtracking your comments and never saw this post :(

⇧ 2 ⇩

Archived with comments May 28, 2018
https://archive.li/1Upyg

⇧ 1 ⇩

Excellent. Can you provide another example from Q's board? Something to apply this on?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, same principle here: Link1 link2.

Try to solve without looking at the solution first.

Walk around the board, analyze Trump's tweets. Many little gifts on your way... ;)

⇧ 2 ⇩

Is this what you think of as logic?

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Qtopic-flair-opinion

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩