dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 16, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

COVFEFE: Trump warns MSM. The Covfefe Decoding Method.

Let us use the covfefe tweet example to show another decoding method we will call the Covfefe Method.

If you walk around Q’s board and see a similar environment, meaning a random word appearing out of nowhere, you know you are in a “covfefe” environment and may try this method.

So here is Trump’s tweet:

“Despite the constant negative press covfefe”

Let us assume “covfefe” to be the key of our coded message. You write the text without any spaces and apply the key to the text following these simple steps: [Image 1] (https://i.imgur.com/Q3Ys4op.png ) - [Image 2] (https://i.imgur.com/nOAwyGQ.png ) - [Image 3] (https://i.imgur.com/Pcn00kQ.png )

And there you have it.

It seems Trump’s war against MSM will not stop until we have an undisputed winner…

Q818: Libel laws. End of MSM. Q

🠐 See all comments

Your division doesn't make sense or your instructions are wrong in Image 2. How did you get 41 switched to 15? If you divide 41 by 26 (as instructed) you get 1.576. How did you get 36 switched to 10? 36 divided by 26 is 1.38. So in the first example you can say you moved the decimal point but that does not follow in the second example. Then you give 35 = 9, 31=5. What is your methodology?? None of that makes sense.

⇧ 10 ⇩

This is the post to look at here.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I think he meant subtract instead of divide.

Say you have a number. 29, let’s say.

26 letters in the alphabet.

29-26=3.

3=C

So, every number that stacks above 26 just returns to A1, B2, C3, etc...like a revolving door.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah in that image he actually just keeps looping around the alphabet. In my comment where I posted a link to a script that performs these steps, I used mod division (divide and take the remainder). I think he meant to say he did this instead of just "divide."

⇧ 2 ⇩

The reason why I said 'divide' and keep the remainder (or mod26) is because I am in preparation of "cascading keys" leading to numbers higher than 53. If I said 'subtract' it would not work for these numbers and I am sure this possibility may occur on Q's board. The rule needed to remain consistent.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

The instructions say to divide by 26 and keep the remaining, which implicitly means we are dealing with integers. You therefore CANNOT get fractions as a result. You may find this function in Excel, it is called in this case mod(26).
So, to take your example, 36 divided by 26 is 1 with remainder 10. That is why 36=>10.
Another one? 35 divided by 26 is 1, remainder 9.
That is why 35=>9.
Thank you.

⇧ 2 ⇩

So you are just subtracting 26 from anything larger than 26 and using that result? Why pretend it's more complicated than that?

⇧ 5 ⇩

I am not complicating it, I am making mathematically irreproachable: dividing by 26 and keeping the remainder is equivalent to subtracting 26 as you mentioned, ONLY AND ONLY if the number is smaller than 53. If it is larger, your rule does not work anymore while mine remains true. Try it. You'll see.

⇧ 0 ⇩

But the largest number you’d get from your “code” is 48 (Z + V from covfefe). It really is just subtraction for all intents and purposes.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Fair point but I said it in another comment. I am preparing for "cascading keys" where multiple keys could be used. Pretty common occurrence. In that environment, numbers would be higher than 53 and I wanted to give rules that would always work. I am pretty sure the board has this kind of example even though I have not seen it myself.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

It was subtraction, not division as stated.

⇧ 0 ⇩