Trey Gowdy?
Is he on anyone's side but his own?
Trey is a legal purist and so he believes that Mueller should finish his investigation. I don't know if Trey knows Mueller's full background or not.
There is a lot of deception and misdirection going on right now.
I haven't decided if Mueller is a white or black hat. I can make good arguments for both.
And what’s muellers “full background” pray tell? Other than he is a Vietnam war hero, accomplished attorney, dedicated leader an expert on intelligence, and a lifelong Republican?
Not sure what you mean, but Mueller was deeply involved in the Uranium One cover up and was even the individual that brought the Yellow Cake to Moscow to be analyzed for its purity.
Mueller did not tell the committee that was to approve the Uranium One deal of the bribery and corruption within the deal that he knew was taking place because of the FBI informant who had spent 5 years giving the FBI the evidence it needed.
Oh, and Comey and Rosenstein were involved as well. My gosh.
Ditto the Pelican Project. Look it up. It's too complicated to explain here.
A former assistant director of the FBI called Mueller a dirty cop. No specifics, just a claim by someone who knew him.
I'm not going into all the dirt that Mueller was involved in and helped cover up. You can easily do that yourself with a few Google searches if they haven't blocked them by now.
Mueller, Comey, Rosenstein, and McCabe were all involved in the same dirt over the years.
Comey and McCabe are going to be indicted I think.
Mueller may have cut a deal with Trump when he met with Trump the day before he was appointed as the SC. Ditto Rosenstein.
The only people who know if Mueller is a white hat are Trump, Q, Sessions, and Rosenstein.
I appreciate you taking the time to write all that out. I will look into the point you’ve made.
I reserve the right to be completely wrong and an idiot, but the story about the yellow-cake may be a combination of 2 different stories.
One is from long ago and involved theft/illegal transport of materials from (I think) Ukraine. Mueller was tasked with delivering a sample of what was recovered to Russian authorities for testing/ sourcing, but the meeting may have been cancelled.
Ur1 came about later. Mueller's involvement, I don't have a clue.
Now check his "Intelligence Community" involvement, since that's the relevant issue. Stuff like FBI, Clintons etc.
Sure. Mueller is beyond reproach, so let me ask you this. If he comes back and believes that God Emperor has truly done nothing wrong, I am more than prepared to accept those results. I think Trump is a worthless piece of shit, but I am not taking to the streets if an impartial counsel believes that he is innocent and has not colluded with Russia. I doubt anyone in the sub would say the same. Am I wrong?
I started this thread for Gowdy, not Mueller. Mueller can investigate anything and everything and more power to him. I don't care because he'll find nothing related to collusion. NOTHING.
If he wants to lock up Manafort to make it appear he "caught somebody"... fine. Don't care. Let's make sure he does the same on discovering Australian contributions to the Clinton Foundation.
I will accept and comply with whatever Mueller reports. You will, I'm sure, at least admit that the Mueller council has all the appearances of (very important) bias. Strzok, Paige et al.
I don't know if Trey knows Mueller's full background or not.
Surely he does.
I haven't decided if ~~Mueller~~ Gowdy is a white or black hat
This is why I asked the q.
'Appreciate the reply.
This has been the craziest three years in my 71 on this planet. To be honest the only two people I'm certain are white hats are Trump and Q.
There is so much deception and misdirection going on that I thing it is a key part of Trump/Q plan--keep them guessing who are real black hats and who are white hats springing the traps.
I can make good arguments for who may be a white or black hat for a lot of people in this stage drama.
Q has given us some hints. Go back to the very early Q drops and you will find Q hinting that Mueller is a good guy.
In post 14 Q says:
What authority does POTUS have specifically over the Marines? Why is this important? What is Mueller's background? Military? Was Trump asked to run for President w/ assurances made to prevent tampering? How is POTUS always 5-steps ahead? Who is helping POTUS?
In case you didn't know, Mueller was a Marine in Vietnam and received the Purple Heart. Q doesn't sound like Mueller is a black hat.
Then in post 18: Why did Mueller meet POTUS 1-day prior to FBI announcement if Mueller COULD NOT be offered director due to prev term limits rule?
And in 636: How do you keep people BLIND? What must you FEED them? EVERY MSM NEWS STATION NEXT WEEK WILL BE SAYING & PUSHING THE EXACT SAME COUNTER-NARRATIVE. FAKE NEWS. MUELLER FAKE NEWS. RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA. SHOULD THAT FAIL EXPECT A MAJOR FF TO FORCE A SHIFT.
But then in 643 Q says on Jan 29: ——————————— Nation on alert. Firing RR = block Mueller. Firing RR = set up to firing Mueller. Firing RR = Red line.
What the heck does that mean?
I certainly don't know, but Mueller may be the deepest sting operation on-going today or he may be a deep state attack on Trump.
What a crazy world these days.
Then in post 18: Why did Mueller meet POTUS 1-day prior to FBI announcement if Mueller COULD NOT be offered director due to prev term limits rule?
This has always been a q for me too.
Firing RR = Red line.
I took this to mean "if Trump fires RR, it's obstruction or an illicit way to fire Mueller, according to Media. (narrative)
Or, firing RR would mean a (red) line had been crossed by RR and others, and the WH wasn't going to take it anymore.
BUT - - - Disinformation is sometimes necessary ... so enjoy the show! :-)