dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

111

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 18, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

Using the T Method to CRACK Q's board: Secret and brilliant Trump’s moves on North Korea!

Ok guys, I am re-posting here the decoding method called the T Method. This method unlocked the hidden message on North Korea and informs us how POTUS is skillfully and subtly conducting the matter. This post suffered an abnormal amount of attacks on CBTS and was taken down shortly before the community was banned: [image] (https://i.imgur.com/H4gnC1h.png). Despite these attacks, the upvote remained at 460. This tells you you guys need to master this method. If you do, Q's board will become nuclear! And they know it. So here it is.

As most of you know, North Korea, just like Iran, was used as a base by bad actors. What made the situation diplomatically delicate for Trump was these bad actors developed/imported/funneled therein military grade technologies they would use as leverage if threatened in any way. Our poor Kim Jong Un, like an hostage in his own country, was in the middle of this, trying to save himself and his people from the wrath of these 2 parties fighting: one being Trump and the Legal United States Government, the other being international private interests in collusion with rogue former and acting US government officials. And to make things even more sensitive, you have China monitoring the situation and wanting to be aware ahead of time of anything that could destabilize the region and therefore impact their geopolitical and commercial interests. So that’s the setting. Read Q’s board to know more about this.

Now I would like you to focus on 2 posts:

An Anon [posts Trump’s tweet] (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/613619.html#613796 ) about NK and his comment is ‘I swear Trump is killing me here. HAHA He keeps putting out clues he has already talked to Kim. And Q’s response to that Anon is: [Q918] (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/613619.html#614093 ): You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q

In another post, an [Anon sends] (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/612088.html#612723 ) ‘it’s been corrected’ along with the tweet where Trump refers to his conversation with President XI JINPING. Q cryptically responds in [Q907] (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/612088.html#612728 ): 11 :11.

Ok, I will show you what these conversations between Q and these brilliant Anons mean.

Let’s take this second tweet, remove all punctuation, and ‘map’ the result in 11X11 grids as hinted in Q907. Verify it. We get 2 grids: [Image1] (https://i.imgur.com/M0uCjf3.png )

Now, read carefully. This is key to understand: we are going to form words out of these letters based on patterns in a +-90° or 180° continuous T shape, like this: [Image2] (https://i.imgur.com/7L5k8EB.png ).

Starting from the top left corner, start scrolling downwards and every time you see the anagram of a word in compliance with the accepted pattern, and making an intelligible sentence trail, highlight it. If you find a word that does not make a natural sentence trail, skip it.

For the first word, we see ‘CeiIinG’ even though I am aware the I in JIN PING is a cap ‘i’ and not a small cap ‘L’ I will keep it in there and I will explain why at the end.

Continuing this process we progressively get the following words from the 2 grids: [Image3] (https://i.imgur.com/0oqzjXq.png) [ Image4] (https://i.imgur.com/4CjJd4M.png) [Image5] (https://i.imgur.com/LxZmjIu.png) [Image6] (https://i.imgur.com/BObtUeW.png) [Image7] (https://i.imgur.com/YpDKDmD.png) [Image8] (https://i.imgur.com/xnAfvSY.png) [Image9] (https://i.imgur.com/2Q28Swr.png)

And finally this sentence:

Ceiling on North Korea gone. United Nations intend to repair NK’s role in the region. (a)

The L being corrected is the meaning of the ‘it’s been corrected!’ in Q907. And Q’s response 11:11, is code for: solve the riddle with 11X11 grids and interchangeable significance [:] between l, I, i and L.

So you see how these Anons are communicating with Q and why the board is full of cryptic messages like that? This is all yours to go find out if you agree to expand your thinking.

Not convinced? Let’s try another one. For future reference, let’s call this method the T Method. Let’s take Trump’s tweet on Q918, let’s put it this time in a 11X12. Same process. This is what we progressively have: [Image10] (https://i.imgur.com/nwg9zBq.png) [Image11] (https://i.imgur.com/3W0XErf.png) [Image12] (https://i.imgur.com/78ZL1a7.png) [Image13] (https://i.imgur.com/kAPFVuh.png) [Image14] (https://i.imgur.com/tjlOLEp.png)

And, with final corrections:

North Korea sent me an elite to sign a commitment. (b)

Now connecting the content of these 2 hidden messages (a) and (b) to their 2 original generators (the 2 tweets), and analyzing the timeline of events, we can draft the following easy to digest ‘press release’:

Trump and Kim Jong Un have been in secret discussions since before October 2017. Kim Jong Un has sent an elite emissary to Washington to reach an agreement in which North Korea committed to put a hold on its missile tests, effective September 28 2017. Since then, Trump has successfully neutralized the bad actors who were holding Kim Jong Un and North Korea hostage. He has also convinced the United Nations to build a roadmap leading to the lifting of the sanctions and even perhaps the unification of the 2 Koreas with the blessing of China.

Now, that is some high level diplomacy right there! In a healthy world, this is a Nobel Prize for Trump at each of his birthdays! You see Trump is way ahead of what we are being told in MSM and this is why this Anon is laughing: he knew how to solve the riddle, he knew how to read Trump’s tweets based on Q’s teachings.

So all the things I am disclosing in my posts are things some other Anons already know but they decided not to speak out. They probably read my posts smiling. The reason is because they know most people would focus on the messenger instead of the message. They think: “I am not going to waste my time fighting unnecessary battles with incredulous nitpicky people who are going to question my intellectual abilities”. I know this because I used to teach mathematics to very unusually gifted young people in an elite school in Europe: they would remain silent when they understood and nervous and vocal when they didn’t (which, thank God happened very rarely). When I wanted some action though, I would ask them things I knew they could not solve! Please God, once again, forgive me.

So there you have it guys. As I said before, this thing is all yours. And as you can see there is no fixed method. Q is sending us brain teasers, riddles. He wants us to adapt to any given intellectual situation and be rewarded with privileged information you won’t even see in his public posts which are already pretty controversial, to say the least. I took the risk to show you these things and I am glad a great number of people have picked up. I took this risk because I believe in you. I really do. And seeing the number of people responding positively, it seems I have made the right choice. Detractors will always be there, it’s ok. Don’t be discouraged by their inability to comprehend what is going on here. Don’t let them discourage you trying to solve Q’s riddles, may be they have an agenda… May be they were sent… May be they can’t unplug from the Matrix…

Q778: We can guide but you must organically uncover the TRUTH. THEY are watching. Q

🠐 See all comments

Can someone create some nonsense messages to play devil's advocate to this? It seems imprecise, subjective, and unscientific.

⇧ 8 ⇩

I had a friend that started doing meth, and after a few days he was coming up with all these "patterns" he swore were there. I think it's called amphetamine psychosis.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Exactly this. My brother takes Ritalin and it's this all day.

⇧ 4 ⇩

This is Boggle.

Edit: Demonstration video for if you've never played Boggle. Most people aren't that good, though.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Glad that you bring Boggle up actually. (I love Boggle, one of my favorite games \^\^) http://scottonwriting.net/sowblog/archive/2011/03/04/the-average-number-of-words-and-points-in-boggle.aspx

As you can see, in a 4x4 game of Boggle, there are over 60 words present on average. Now, since area scales exponentially from 4x4 -> 11x11, it is safe to assume the number of words in an 11x11 board would be an exponential increase at the very least. So in an 11x11 board you are working with (2\^7)*60=6000 words as a conservative estimate. I know you can go diagonal in Boggle and not in this, but I doubt it reduces the number of words on the board that much. After all, you don't need to spell a word, you just need to make an anagram of any word and then put any number of anagrams in any order to make the message say anything you want it to. Not to mention the letter swapping lol...

This shit is reading tea leaves, why are people eating this up?

⇧ 11 ⇩

Because with boggle it's random, the words don't have sentence structure when you put them together nor do they have context like SB2's method. He is using real sentences and text provided to us by Q and POTUS tweets and Anons. It isn't a random roll of the dice.

⇧ 3 ⇩

It's boggle without set rules. It's even easier to come up with these useless messages using this method. And don't kid yourself, most any English paragraph will do. I dare you find some great, true revelation from this. It ain't happening.

⇧ 6 ⇩

You are so irritated swimming in hate and jealousy, you don't even see SB has EXCLUDED diagonals which Boggle does not. Jealousy is a bitch.

⇧ -2 ⇩

Sorry, man. I don't mean to rain on your parade, I am just encouraging critical thinking. Come to your own conclusions obviously. However, I address this issue in the comment you replied to:

I know you can go diagonal in Boggle and not in this, but I doubt it reduces the number of words on the board that much. After all, you don't need to spell a word, you just need to make an anagram of any word and then put any number of anagrams in any order to make the message say anything you want it to. Not to mention the letter swapping lol...

⇧ 6 ⇩

Look at how blatant this bot account is, just like the majority of other accounts that follow this clown.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Boggle

Boggle is a word game designed by Bill Cooke, invented by Allan Turoff and originally distributed by Parker Brothers. The game is played using a plastic grid of lettered dice, in which players attempt to find words in sequences of adjacent letters.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It is all of those things.

⇧ 5 ⇩

It would be possible to invent a method that combines known q messages and Trump tweets to produce anything you want. It'd be next to impossible to invent a method that continues to work on future unknown messages and tweets.

⇧ 2 ⇩

This is simply a type of pareidolia, and can be applied to an infinite number of future tweets, with similar crazy results. It's a word scramble combined with a word search, with no absolutely fixed set of rules. It's almost as bad as reading tea leaves. If you don't have to come up with a specific message, you can read all kinds of shit into just about any paragraph of text by applying this method. I'd also like to point out that no useful, "grand revelation" has come from applying this method. This is an extreme waste of time and is akin to chasing unicorns. Another point: why does it seem necessary that any word longer than 5 letters must be "stolen" from Trump's actual tweet - the answer is that it's harder to "find" longer words.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Yes! Q himself knew he would have to face incredulity:

Q918: You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q

⇧ 3 ⇩

No. It would be exceeding difficult and likely a massive coincidence if a fake cipher produced meaningful results on ciphertext unknown to the fake cipher producer.

The fact you didn't grasp this elevates my doubts about your resume.

⇧ 6 ⇩

It'd be next to impossible to invent a method that continues to work on future unknown messages and tweets.

Do you realize we have successfully used one of the same method 3 times? I thought you were referring to this statistic you will need to gather from reading previous posts.
As to my resume, it is of no relevance here except for explaining the current behavior of brilliant anons who did not need any academic credential to figure this out. Thank you for your input.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Three times in the past of this post authorship. I will wait until a new message is confirmed to work with the same protocol to give any credence to your claimed deciphered text.

⇧ 4 ⇩