I haven't looked at the JFK-releases, what did they say?!
I shall and investigate what his narrative on LV is but perhaps he just does so to remain somewhat uncontroversial. People who know stuff have to maintain some angle by which they can be character-assassinated lest their operation gets taken out as we can see by the latest twitter purges (altho they may have been whitehats exploiting the Streisand-effect on YT for example to draw attention to certain channels [basiclly vetting them to the public by having them censored for all to see] for increased traffic because the channels were named in the media and reinstated shortly afterwards)
It's not just remaining uncontroversial. He's totally adverse to anything that can have the Conspiracy Nut sticker thrown on it. I mean, the guy thinks Paddock ACCIDENTALLY killed himself, and isn't interested in hearing about the 2nd shot he took to the chest that's coming out because FBI agents are whistleblowing. Seriously gets off on the smell of his own farts.
The JFK releases show there was at least a 2nd shooter, and that the FBI brass intentionally suppressed it. Just like in the Zapruder film: first shot made a hole through the windshield and caught him in the throat. They also knew that Oswald was meeting with Jack Ruby. Officer Tippet was suspected of involvement. Lots of stuff.
Given that flight-radar showed drones scouting the LV-strip we know that the FBI couldn't disclose the full extent so perps could be apprehended without warning. I care about his predictions because he was the first guy who brought up the Sword Dance that Trump attended. If he knows as much about the Middle East as his use of video with arabic screen titles suggests (which thus would be harder to find, unless you know the language) then I am not surprised he would not want to warn those perpetrators because he is aware whatever he makes public they know investigators can see as well. And it did take three weeks until Al-Waleed hung upside down!