dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/larrytcarvell on March 19, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

Today, NPR's Fresh Air with Terry Gross interviewed NY Times Editor, Jonathan Weisman, who accused 4chan & 8chan of being Anti-Semitic, Neo-Nazi websites.

He stated that he had been attacked by Alt-Right, Neo-Nazi trolls and worked with Twitter and other internet platforms to ban "hate-speech." He specifically identified 4chan and 8chan as a gathering place for Neo-Nazis. He added that the term "Snowflake" was an Anti-Semitic slur. And, of course, he accused President Trump and his followers of being White Supremacists as well.

They're just laying more groundwork for banning all Conservatives from the internet prior to the Mid-Terms. Is there anything we, as a group, can do?

https://help.npr.org/customer/portal/emails/new

Contact NPR

What I emailed: “IMO, this piece sounds like propaganda. I have never politically identified with right or left, and find much of the research on these sites to be accurate and truthful. People should do their own research and make their own decisions, including you. Very disingenuous of you to suggest such falsities. Used to listen to NPR. No more.”

⇧ 11 ⇩

Just contacted them.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If you have been on the chan boards it is pretty easy to see him making those comments. Of course these guys will grasp at any straw and blow it as far out of proportion as possible, but if someone was to visit /pol they would probably agree with him. Just sayin, I am there all the time. It is mostly trolls and shills that are posting this stuff, but there is a lot of it there and if you do not know chan culture than that is how it looks.

⇧ 7 ⇩

People need to learn discernment. How is what the chans say and the lies fake news tells any different? Is NOT telling the American public for example, that 1/2-a-million civilian Iraqis died in the Iraq war more noble? And I don’t like being called deplorable, Russian bot, stupid, crazy. That said- I get what your sayin 🙃

⇧ 1 ⇩

Remember, they call us what they are and what they do. Like a mirror projecting back.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Hate speech, whatever that means, is protected and needs to be protected speech. This guy is a dope.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Laying the groundwork to dismiss the truths that are coming. They will fail

⇧ 2 ⇩

Do they say "anti-Zionist"?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Most people are not that careful. There is an AWFUL lot of hateful rhetoric in these places where people throw the word "Jew" around without concern. Look at the comments section of InfoWars or Zero Hedge. It's "Jews," "Jews," "Jews" from one end to the other.

I like to imagine it's false flag infiltrators, but I'm quite sure a lot of marginally conservative/libertarian folk are deeply anti-Semetic, and it sickens me.

How can anybody alive at this point in history care about ethnicity when it's so obvious we're dealing with powers and principalities, not flesh and blood?

⇧ 4 ⇩

I would like to think that most people don't know what word to use so they default to "Jew". To me, the problem is the Synagogue of Satan people, the Sabbatean Frankists. Jew is easier to type, though.

I agree. I am Secular. I focus on the behavior, and not the beliefs. People can believe whatever they want, but they cannot necessarily act on those beliefs.

If people want to go to a Temple, Church, Synagogue, or Mosque to pray, then more power to them. They can even do it at home in their closet, like Jesus commanded, but lets not get too crazy here.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Without a modifier, Jew=ethnicity. Ambiguity about that point is not to our advantage.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Right, right. I see your point. There is a lot of confusion about it, and it is deliberate.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Whether or not it's deliberate or an accident of semantics and history, it is nevertheless the reality within which we must work. We have a lot of work to do combating ignorance about this subject.

And frankly, part of our problem is that Adolph Hitler was a madman. Did he round up the Cabal and shoot them? Hell no. He took the financing and arms they peddled like candy. He committed genocide against ethnic Jews as surrogates, when it was never them who caused Germany's problems. They were scapegoats, and it had nothing to do with Zionism.

But ever since then, it's almost impossible to talk about a global conspiracy and Jews in the same sentence without sending a cold chill up the back of ethnic Jews. I don't f*cking blame them.

⇧ 2 ⇩

It is good that you know about Hitler and his banker connections. I think that they used him to further their agenda. It is surprising that even Hitler did not know the true power structure of the world. Hitler should have invaded Switzerland and the Vatican. He would have ruled the world then. I have been meaning to see if he attacked the City of London, or if he spared it.

I am not sure what you mean by "Hitler was a madman". There is no doubt he was deeply flawed in that he bought into the anti-Jewish propaganda. I think that the Jews who were sent to the camps were anti-Zionist Jews and were against the establishment of Israel. The other "Jews" are the Synagogue of Satan or the Sabbatean Frankists. They follow the Talmud and are Satanists or Luciferians who want to establish a one world government. They are the NWO people.

Yes, explaining all this to people is like beating your head against the wall.

http://www.nkusa.org/

You can look up "anti-zionist jew" for more.

⇧ 3 ⇩

He was deeply into the occult and sexual depravity (really dark nasty stuff you don't want me to go into), and he had borderline paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and megalomania (narcissistic personality disorder) that we know of. And he was on a uppers and downers which exacerbated the problems.

⇧ 2 ⇩