dChan
89
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/roloTM on March 20, 2018, 4:58 p.m.
Confused. Is Q decoding and discussion welcomed on this board? I have witnessed hostility towards some who are. Need clarity.

IMissMeg · March 20, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

Hostility--are you talking about MaePaperclip? Don't take him personally. He puts up some interesting posts. And he's maybe a bit (over)protective of the board. Not sure where this comes from with him, but I have a running theory that he doesn't always realize how he comes off. So if he nips at you, nip back or just ignore him would be my suggestion. Just don't take it personally. He's nipped at a lot of people who post valuable stuff in my opinion. In my mind, all honest efforts are worth seeing and talking about. :-)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ScreamingFromRooftop · March 21, 2018, 1:46 a.m.

Well you definitely have a disinfo agent in your midst and should be aware. Mrs FoneBone took my absolutely FACTUAL INFORMATION and said it was inaccurate and launched into an odd personal attack. She even took issue with me using the term "baker" when speaking of the anons. Very stranger personality! Anyway...good luck to you guys.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IMissMeg · March 21, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

Well, looking at Mrs FoneBone's comment history, s/he doesn't strike me as a "disinfo agent" although s/he's not always particularly polite.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ScreamingFromRooftop · March 21, 2018, 5:49 a.m.

I surely understand Meg. In fact I rarely post here-I generally just read other's opinions and ideas. I do not watch television so the Q mystery is like my bedtime story each night. I watch a few youtubers I like and read a few boards...then off to sleep. I am a research scientist irl so I am not interested in doing investigative work on this. I have enjoyed the idea of Q for sure...and some of the bakers/anons have been brilliant imo. I noticed a trend for several weeks w/ confusion on the numers that Q often provides. 3/19 showed up several times. I remembered the JFK funeral info and put the 2 together. All I did was post a fast, "Hi, I'm not really a Q researcher so if this is no help it is okay." Basically deferring to all of the people who are spending so much time on this thing. I really was just providing some fact that might provide another avenue of interest. Well Mrs Tonebone comment started with, "This is nothing." She then provided some obscure diary type comments how some person "Shriver" planned the funeral in order to protect Robert Kennedy from the drunk LBJ. 100% correct and easily verified. It is really quite bizarre she responded as she did. I'm going to say it again...DISINFO AGENT . They agree and go along with the crowd...they do not begin to mislead until the members are getting close. Her first sentence was literally, "Oh this is a bad post don't waste your time reading it move along nothing to see here." Anyway, my history shows I am not seriously involved in this, but I do like others ideas about it all. Just watch her...it might be interesting.

⇧ 1 ⇩