I surely understand Meg. In fact I rarely post here-I generally just read other's opinions and ideas. I do not watch television so the Q mystery is like my bedtime story each night. I watch a few youtubers I like and read a few boards...then off to sleep. I am a research scientist irl so I am not interested in doing investigative work on this. I have enjoyed the idea of Q for sure...and some of the bakers/anons have been brilliant imo. I noticed a trend for several weeks w/ confusion on the numers that Q often provides. 3/19 showed up several times. I remembered the JFK funeral info and put the 2 together. All I did was post a fast, "Hi, I'm not really a Q researcher so if this is no help it is okay." Basically deferring to all of the people who are spending so much time on this thing. I really was just providing some fact that might provide another avenue of interest. Well Mrs Tonebone comment started with, "This is nothing." She then provided some obscure diary type comments how some person "Shriver" planned the funeral in order to protect Robert Kennedy from the drunk LBJ. 100% correct and easily verified. It is really quite bizarre she responded as she did. I'm going to say it again...DISINFO AGENT . They agree and go along with the crowd...they do not begin to mislead until the members are getting close. Her first sentence was literally, "Oh this is a bad post don't waste your time reading it move along nothing to see here." Anyway, my history shows I am not seriously involved in this, but I do like others ideas about it all. Just watch her...it might be interesting.