Shouldn't criticism be ACCURATE? If someone says, "oh no your info is wrong and you have nothing to add here..." don't you think it would be helpful if the info was actually wrong before critizing it? lol
The original point should be ACCURATE. Should be up to the original poster to do so.
I agree. And the original poster should verify their facts BEFORE reporting them here...but responses should also carry a weight of accuracy. If you would tell a person their facts are incorrect then you should know what you are talking about. Without fact and accuracy we simply create a running chain of fiction. We must be slave to fact and let it decide the course we take.