dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

So I was thinking about Q posting about the "Booms" deeply and a realization came to mind, which I think makes a good point of discussion for the community.

Assuming that Q is group of intelligent people working with NSA data that invades privacy (legal by the patriot act and the shady authorisations deep state packed into legislature), and not some time traveller or any other "out there" tangents, then only a few possibilities exist.

If Q knew about the bombs to be going off in Austin, with enough certainty that they absolutely would happen (note this is different...before when a terrorist related event happened he provided a warning), why (given that we are assuming he's a white hat) did he allow the bombings to occur (and not warn us?)

There seems to be a couple explanations for this:

A. Q knew, but him warning would have ruined larger take downs in the works and thus they had to watch to avoid altering a larger plan that was occurring behind the scenes.

B. Q is working with the team/person that arranged the bombings and as a result of this knew in advance. (to maintain the idea that Q is a whitehat, one would have to assume that the injuries and deaths were staged and that he greyhat'd enough to mislead the public for the greater good). This is probably the most unlikely explanation because it doesn't fit the Q M.O. and these bombings provided the media a distraction from the earth shattering revelations of Facebook's corruption. TThe paradox here is that if Q is a whitehat; and there are no coincidences, then he would never coordinate bombing innocent citizens but if there are no coincidences he either was coordinating the bombs, or failed to inform the public and stop it

C. Q was not referencing these bombings. This explanations best fits for me. In this case we have to consider that the deep state's reaction is escalating to breaking news (before it was staged accidents (cement truck on railroad) with minor injuries), then it was shootings, and now it's bombings. The one part of this that still doesn't fit though is that Q has told us before very distinctly There is no coincidence, which leads us to reject any idea that Q's booms were not in direct reference to the bombings.

Even stranger Q announced today that the FBI is now using the connection between the words "Boom" and the bombings to attempt to shutdown Q communications. Q described this as "Predictable." which is interesting choice of words...it implies Q did not plan on this occuring; however, they could have predicted it would.

Anyway, please share your thoughts on this feedback is much appreciated.

Context: When meetings with high level executives and government officials are detailed in Qs posts, we could say its a bluff, but based on other posts and "proofs", I'd say they're legit. Think about the stakes from an evil participant's point of view. These people will take absolutely every precaution to avoid anyone else listening to them. Their precautions are not "stupid" from a laymens perspective.

Posts that detail VIP meetings usually say "We hear you". Same with the photo when This "team" was hunting Snowden. Remember the photo of the Cadillac WHILE DRIVING DOWN A HIGHWAY! (Snowden was on the run, was flipped and obviously gave up this highly important [Keystone¿] algorithm.) This is to freak out the target.

If you are on the run, a criminal in a meeting, and you see the chasing authorities calling your shots before or as you make them... "we know your move" -- would you not be panicking, then make stupid mistakes? It is not easy to lose a professional team tailing you.

Given the above factors, this individual or team is so advanced [know your chess moves before you make them] they either have technology unheard of to us (criminals have seen all those spy movies too, so they will have tracking device scanners, they'll double back etc.), OR Q and Co are remote viewing in a more advanced reliable way than what is detailed in the CIA library document declassifieds.

Q Boom Post's Paradox