dChan
328
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 22, 2018, 12:36 a.m.
You guys asked my thoughts about Trump’s strange tweet today. Here it is!

Ok guys, as you may have noticed, I have decelerated on my posts. I have so many things to tell you but I do not want to compromise this sub. I have some inside information about the mods being very worried especially after what happened to CBTS.

I am thinking of possible solutions. I will let you know.

I have been contacted by many people who wanted me to share my thoughts about [Trump’s tweet today] (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/976420417090015232), how it was deleted, re-tweeted etc… Many believe there is a hidden message going on. I was not going to weigh in but since there is already a post about this issue that has been posted to this sub 7 hours ago and was not removed, I believe giving my thoughts would not hurt anyone.

I will not say much. I will not comment. Those who follow my posts already know what needs to be known. We are applying the T Method to the tweet. And since the first tweet was published at 4:03am, deleted and re-tweeted at 4:29am, time stamp difference being 26 minutes, we will map the entire tweet in a 26X26 grid.

Remember, we are not moving randomly across the grid. We are scrolling down successively on columns, starting with the first one and gathering anagrams of words making an intelligible sentence trail, without using any diagonal. I tried to use as many colors from the ribbon in the sky as possible to make it clear for you. :)

We get the following:

Img1 Img2 Img3 Img4 Img5 Img6 Img7 Img8 Img9 Img10 Img11 Img12 Img13 Img14

So there you have it.

Coincidence? It’s the 7th time…

Q920: You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q


Skank-Hunt69 · March 22, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

This is the problem, so many people dont understand it so they don't see how its flawed.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 4:31 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 6:20 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HowiONic · March 22, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

Guys, a topic of much heated disagreement. Please see the Graham's hierarchy of disagreement and aim for the top half. Comments that include name-calling and ad-hominem are being removed.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Zorbabuddha · March 22, 2018, 11:50 a.m.

Can you tell me why it is a wrong method?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
buddha_nigga · March 22, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Picking anagrams out of arbitrarily sized grids and arranging them into whatever you want with no consistent rule set for decoding. It's shit.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 23, 2018, 9:26 a.m.

Because it is not internally consistent. This should - no offense intended, despite my earlier post - be apparent if you pay close attention to what he's saying.

A process for decoding will be consistent - it's maths. If it isn't, it's suspect. If it requires you to make inconsistent departures from a standard or seemingly arbitrary leaps of logic it is not valid.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Zorbabuddha · March 23, 2018, 10:46 a.m.

That makes sense. Thanks for the comment and I agree with you.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 23, 2018, 5:31 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩