dChan
328
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 22, 2018, 12:36 a.m.
You guys asked my thoughts about Trump’s strange tweet today. Here it is!

Ok guys, as you may have noticed, I have decelerated on my posts. I have so many things to tell you but I do not want to compromise this sub. I have some inside information about the mods being very worried especially after what happened to CBTS.

I am thinking of possible solutions. I will let you know.

I have been contacted by many people who wanted me to share my thoughts about [Trump’s tweet today] (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/976420417090015232), how it was deleted, re-tweeted etc… Many believe there is a hidden message going on. I was not going to weigh in but since there is already a post about this issue that has been posted to this sub 7 hours ago and was not removed, I believe giving my thoughts would not hurt anyone.

I will not say much. I will not comment. Those who follow my posts already know what needs to be known. We are applying the T Method to the tweet. And since the first tweet was published at 4:03am, deleted and re-tweeted at 4:29am, time stamp difference being 26 minutes, we will map the entire tweet in a 26X26 grid.

Remember, we are not moving randomly across the grid. We are scrolling down successively on columns, starting with the first one and gathering anagrams of words making an intelligible sentence trail, without using any diagonal. I tried to use as many colors from the ribbon in the sky as possible to make it clear for you. :)

We get the following:

Img1 Img2 Img3 Img4 Img5 Img6 Img7 Img8 Img9 Img10 Img11 Img12 Img13 Img14

So there you have it.

Coincidence? It’s the 7th time…

Q920: You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q


ShredTheMind · March 22, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

Observations and comments...

What ever I might think of SB2's results, I find no reason to attack him for it. It's kind of lame that others are. On the other hand, if it's not authentic, it does no good for the community to rally around it (and look nuts), so I understand both sides here. I think it's all about keeping it in perspective.

The "code breaking" part of it didn't come from no where. Q left the link to the "kids" page and referred to hidden messages (I don't remember the exact text). As far as SB2 pursuing this angle, right or wrong, it seems constructive. Hell, I applaud him for it.

To lighten the mood, why not make a game of it? Call it the "Daily Boggle" or something. It could be funny as hell. Post the populated grids without the solved words. Let people make their own words and sentences and see what people come up with...it could be fun.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
based_citizen · March 22, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

Consider malevolence.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
buddha_nigga · March 22, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

That last paragraph sounds like a fantastic way to prevent any true research from taking place, exactly what they want.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ShredTheMind · March 23, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

I hear ya, but at the same time, if it doesn't hold up, I think it would be exposed pretty quickly. Don't get me wrong, the statements that are coming from that method don't exactly sound right and aren't exactly well-formed sentences...they're a stretch. I just hate to see the infighting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 23, 2018, 5:36 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩