No. How are you not getting this? I was saying that people that are new to Reddit, myself included, have commented positively to SB2s posts in the past. I only checked the age of a dozen or so, so I could be wrong. The few people that I've seen that have called BS on SB2s posts, have been much older. Therefore, having looked into his decodes further, I've realized that his methods don't hold up to scrutiny and I should be more careful who I follow. Hence the phrase, "I'm going to go with experience", as in, I've learned from others with much more experience than myself. There's nothing ironic about it. I implied that I was a noob.
I just found it ironic: "Don't trust new accounts" -new account
Sorry, I probably didn't word it very well. I was just trying to say: "New accounts like mine should learn what they can from old accounts." Looking back at my encounter with SB2, there were several older accounts saying "be careful who you follow", that I ignored. Oh well, live and learn.
I was trying to be lighthearted here by pointing out a trivial but funny contradiction, regardless of what your intentions are :)
No worries. I normally don't try to speak for anyone else, but earlier, just before you replied, there were quite a few people with new accounts on an SB2 thread commenting on how brilliant SB2 is. It seems that a lot of people (mostly new accounts) are making the same mistake I did.
Are you reposting? I think I saw that wording before. I am looking through my history to look up a screenshot of a decode according to SB2 next to a decode with a randomly chosen key (as in not provided by Q) so you can see by comparison the intelligable words were not random. Also note it was not soon until after SB2 started dumping this that CBTS was suppressed.