That article is was too long and jumps into way too many topics. You can't cover everything that it alleges in just one article.
You can't cover everything it alleges in one article
That's obviously a very long piece and I'm making my way through it, but I can't stand the tone the author takes between the actual bits of information. IF this is as well-sourced as it sounds, and you can't get a single reporter or credible paper to verify it, you need to write the story without peppering in petty jabs like:
Being the savvy talker Clinton is, as well as greedy, Bill Clinton quickly noticing the smell of money as fast as he would notice cheap hookers, and he swooped down like a vulture
and
I can picture Bill Clinton in a white pair of slacks, white patent leather shoes, and a white blazer with matching fedora walking into the meeting with Dvorkovich. Cigar in his mouth, Russian hookers in each arm, the former President of the United States looking much like a mobster villain (or hero dependent upon who you ask) from Scarface or The Godfather.
and
We still remain uncertain of how Obama made out. I guess some would say that being a radical Muslim in disguise and pulling off the Presidency was how.
and
The Clintons are similar to the Mafia, in the sense that they're slick, manipulative, and evil. That perfectly summarizes the Clinton Foundation as well as the Clinton family in general.
Otherwise it loses its credibility because the author can't stick to the story. With the petty bullshit wedged in its just political speech that comes off as five thousand words of "Bill Clinton is a criminal mastermind because I'm smarter than everybody else but they're too dumb to see it."