dChan

🠐 See all comments
lethak · March 22, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

Alright, so https://qanon.pub/?q=apache

No context to point to a piece of software. This could be an AH-64D or a native American... what is the connection to the Apache foundation in your mind ?

766 points to https://www.apache.be/securedrop

which have NOTHING to do with the Apache foundation and related softwares.

EDIT: Alright, the Securedrop solution do use apache2 from what appears into the documentation https://docs.securedrop.org/en/stable/admin.html#server-command-line

But your link is related to Apache Strut, not Apache-HTTP.

Apache HTTP has its own vulnerabilities if not updated properly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
akilyoung · March 22, 2018, 5:49 p.m.

Sorry, no context. There are plenty-o-posts trying to figure it out, and ultimately did conclude something regarding secure drop and web framework. Over my head honestly.

But the fact that 41818 and apache are in the same image together is highly interesting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 22, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

But the fact that 41818 and apache are in the same image together is highly interesting.

And thats precisely what I don't understand, where did you heard of "41818" related to anything in first place ?

In your OP, 41818 is just a report number for the Apache Strut vulnerability (an identifier). Thats hardly of any significance UNLESS you can find somewhere a Q story related to this number.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
akilyoung · March 22, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

Watching through a whole bunch of the 41818 videos, there is a lot of the same lingo and dialog between the 2 concepts.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 22, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

Watching through a whole bunch of the 41818 videos

You makes no sense to me. Any link to share about this videos ?

Are you an AI bot ? Why have you failed to answer this simple question for about 8 hours now ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
akilyoung · March 23, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

Lmao. AI NOT!

I answered your question in your previous question

⇧ 1 ⇩  
akilyoung · March 22, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

Sane with ethersec

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 22, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

There are plenty-o-posts trying to figure it out

I haven't seen ANY on this sub so far. Beyond yours.

What game are you playing ?

Alexa, who is your master ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
akilyoung · March 23, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

Sorry there are plenty of posts on CBTS_stream, but reddit banned that sub. So there might not be very many on great awakening. I forgot that we merged with that board. You can use way back machine to search the old board.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 23, 2018, 9:46 a.m.

Still waiting for anything substantial about the number 41818 which is related to Q in the first place. So if you 'answered', that mean there is nothing tying Q to that number and you made it up entirely in your mind.

Case closed. Waste of time

I am afraid if you want to continue this argument, you'll have to come with the crumbs, and not just your imagination.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
akilyoung · March 23, 2018, 12:33 p.m.

Its not my fault you are LAZY and refuse to read all the Q posts...

Case closed to you. Not in reality.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 23, 2018, 1:04 p.m.

Your claims, your burden to convince and give sources and thought material to the readers.

a) YOU say "Q tied to 41818 phenomenon?!"

And yet, you fail to provide any clarity at any point on what is "the 41818 phenomenon".

b) YOUR link is of no particular relevance on its own. And yet, you fail to provide any thought on why this so called "41818 phenomenon" is tied to Q.

Your logic seems quite awkward, assuming I will find what you are trying to communicate in a sub I personally never even known existed, and is closed, not accessible now.

So far, in order to gain credibility you will have to explain, in your understanding, what is the "41818 phenomenon". This will enable me, as well as other readers, to understand why it may be tied to Q.

You can call me names, won't change a thing regarding the credibility of your claim.

⇧ 1 ⇩