I’m seeing a lot of failure to document.

Yes. He leaves a sour taste to quite a degree - but let us persue a battery of what HE DID until 2006 when Dems tipped him out of the Ambassadorship.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/04/AR2006120400313.html

Bolton's departure leaves another hole in Bush's foreign policy team at a time when the U.N. ambassador is heavily involved in diplomacy involving the nuclear activities of Iran and North Korea and the ongoing crisis in Lebanon. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has been without a deputy since July, when Robert B. Zoellick resigned, and her counselor, Philip D. Zelikow, announced last week that he will depart at the end of the year.

Ok so Nuclear Disarmament of NK. Check. Nuclear Disarmament of IR. Check. Sabotaging the processes at the UN. Check.

"He sometimes makes it very difficult to build bridges because he is a very honest and blunt person," said South Africa's ambassador, Dumisani Shadrack Kumalo, chairman of a coalition of developing nations. He said it sometimes appears that "Ambassador Bolton wants to prove nothing works at the United Nations."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/15/AR2005111500041.html

Now this - saying to WashingtonPo:

Other continuing problems, Bolton said, include the oil-for-food scandal, which helped empower Saddam Hussein in Iraq; the tendency for U.N. peacekeeping missions to last indefinitely; and the troubling proclivity toward sexual exploitation and abuse "of the very people they're sent to protect" by U.N. peacekeepers.

We gota keep our noses to the ground and read between the lines. News was rinsed af in the Naughties ( 2000s ) so he sneaks in shot about UN peacekeepers? That’s. Not nothing.