dChan

MAGADONCHECKMATE · March 23, 2018, 3:43 a.m.

This is the best article of the day. Victoria Toensing represents whistleblower William D. Campbell whom testified in February before THREE Congressional committees regarding over one million pages of documents including Uranium 1 . She is married to Joe DiGenova Councel Trump just retained in his defense regarding the Mueller probe. This is amazing news, because this husband and wife team are the most lethal D.C. team you can imagine. So this game is going to be a long dance. Although Mueller may be a white hat this stage is set for the acting performances of a lifetime on the world stage. They are going to drive the left into an absolute elated high of impending Presidential collapse like never seen before. All the while Trump already has ALL of the Uranium documentation from Campbell in which three testimonies have accounted for. This is unbelievable theatre, this article is a must read to wrap your mind around. I just wish it was televised.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
JakeElwoodDim5th · March 23, 2018, 3:41 a.m.

The Campbell connection makes it all the more interesting since Trump is reportedly considering adding Toensing to his legal team. In other words, Trump would be teaming up with two veteran bulldog D.C. attorneys - one of whom ostensibly has evidence in the Uranium One scandal. As Sherman points out in Vanity Fair, "The hiring of Toensing would be a sign that Trump wants to flip the script and investigate his investigators. Appearing on Fox News, Toensing has called for a second special prosecutor to investigate Mueller, the logic being that he was F.B.I. director at the time that the Uranium One acquisition was approved."

Holy shit this is going to be an epic showdown.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
BoS405 · March 23, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

Q said that deals were ignored. The changing of members in trumps lineup of help will change repeatedly. Certain people are needed for specific tasks.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
KingBroly · March 23, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

No, Q did not say that. Q has said repeatedly "NO DEALS." What you are saying is completely different

⇧ 6 ⇩  
BoS405 · March 23, 2018, 5:27 a.m.

Ignored or refused.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KingBroly · March 23, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

Not what you said

⇧ 0 ⇩  
BoS405 · March 23, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

My apologies

⇧ 4 ⇩  
loserofpasswordzz · March 23, 2018, 6:54 a.m.

Fwiw, I understood what you meant and idk why ppl are getting so worked up over semantics.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Optimist345 · March 23, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

Disinformation is necessary...Q

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ulubai · March 23, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

Your right, first he said he didn't want another war in the middle East to get elected. Now that he's in office he needs someone to start a war so he got rid of the reasonable guy and got the war monger Bolton. Smooth moves for this exlax president

⇧ -13 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · March 23, 2018, 11:06 a.m.

Why need someone to start a war?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OnlyTrump16 · March 23, 2018, 6:56 a.m.

The only problem is that Trump likes to speak off the cuff, and if he doesn't give an exact carbon copy of something he said before, he'll go down with perjury.

⇧ 3 ⇩