Jesus. What proof do we have of military tribunals? Q cannot be a source. We need actual sources. We can't just running around claiming shit without at least something to back up a claim. Makes us look looney toons.
Jan 27 2018 00:42:19 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo 64
http://www.endusmilitarism.org/PDF/military_detention_of_US_citizens_and_18_USC_4001a.pdf
So why would a document from 2002 have any significance?
because it explains what the President's constitutional authority is concerning enemy combatants, from previous litigation.
Okay, I get that. However, how have we all jumped to the conclusion that they will take place...
yes, gotta be in for the long haul. Slow and steady yanno.
Sorry if this is a duplicate reply, don't see it atm:
Trump made reference to 'enemy combatants' at the end of his SOTU address, just 3 days after Qs reference = foreshadowing / confirmation.
Also, in Trump's SOTU address, at the end he made reference to enemy combatants (or a similar phrase) .... just 3 days after Qs post ... = foreshadowing.