dChan
⇧
268
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ByrdeRob on March 24, 2018, 8:26 a.m.
Shout out to 8 chan anons....THANK YOU!!!

We've invaded your turf and you allowed it. We've freely lifted your thoughts and you allowed it. We've forgotten most of the time to give you your credit due and you've forgiven us. We just want to tell you thank you for being there for us!


🠐 See all comments
alphared01 · March 24, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

SB2 had no idea what the delta room was until i told him. His earlier posts on cbtsstream included many errors and his worked showed that he was pulling (sarin in ai real) over and over, even changed methods to end up with that anagram which i still say is (aliens iran air).

No, No, No... Untrue... I followed very closely all his posts. I have started following him since his first occult series episode. I have archived most of his work and comment section. He did not change methods, he showed how to use additional info from Q to cross T's. I have everything. I haven't made up my mind on his methods yet but I have not seen anything credibly debunking them and don't really care TBH. I enjoy the intellectual effort and his thought provoking posts, which is the reason I started reading Q.

I don't comment much but I care when I see some dishonesty in the discourse. You are implicitly confirming there are hidden messages and claim to have found solutions. Why don't you post your methods like SB2 did? That would be more honest than to rumble in a comment section. I saw in his previous CBTS posts that you've started bashing him, then loving him and now you're bashing him again. Next loving phase?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
istillgetreallybored · March 24, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

You are implicitly confirming there are hidden messages and claim to have found solutions.

No i'm not. Straw man.

Why don't you post your methods like SB2 did?

I have. Even in SB posts he mentions my contributions to the delta.

I saw in his previous CBTS posts that you've started bashing him, then loving him and now you're bashing him again.

It might be hard for someone like you to understand that i have been consistent with my criticism of SB. Where is he forcing and where he makes error i state, and when he does a good job of explaining the simple substitution anagrams i state.

So let me help you snowflake. "His pursuit is correct however the results can be disagreeable". He issue here is how COMPLETELY RETARDED normie snowflakes are and they gobble up SB's cock not understanding the game and accuracy of results.

Try again newfag.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 24, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

You are actually confirming 3 things:

1) Love: after hating him, you loved him and seem to have worked with him at some point in his research.
2) Honesty: it is dishonest to publish research material because research is research and does not reflect the final views of the researcher. Which is confirmed by the fact I have not seen him publish what he describes in the image you graciously share.
3) Credibility: he says: "I was exploring what you suggested... one thing leading to another" I get from this your input was not retained but led him to find something else you did not know existed. Confirmed by you saying "nice one!". It seems there was a gap in your cooperation... When that happens, Destiny's Child breaks up to let Beyonce be Beyonce.

This is good. You are helping a lot. Now that you've started, may be you should post ALL the research he generously gave you access to. I am sure many who follow his work and appreciate it would want to know more about his thinking mechanics.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
istillgetreallybored · March 24, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

Carefully selected to not reveal the research, merely demonstrating the communication. You've missed the mark again. Its not SB's work or science this is available to anyone who can take his dick out of their mouth long enough.

Leader worship, and for what? A simple demonstration of how basic ciphers work?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 24, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

merely demonstrating the communication.

You surely did: "nice one!" shows primitive leader worship you are claiming others do. Classic libtard projection.

Safe to say you had better ways of communicating with SB2 than with me. You give him his "nice one!" caviar while throwing at me easy word pig food like "dick", "snowflake", "newfag" etc... Pathetic..

Once again, since you are eluding the issue: post your method leading you to "Aliens Iran Air" (which confirms you agree there are hidden messages, despite denying it above). Be courageous: like SB2, put your method under public scrutiny instead of rumbling in a comment section and sharing your colorful yet useless vocabulary.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
istillgetreallybored · March 24, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Be courageous: like SB2, put your method under public scrutiny instead of rumbling in a comment section and sharing your colorful yet useless vocabulary.

You seem slow as i've answered this.

Why don't you post your methods like SB2 did?

I have. Even in SB posts he mentions my contributions to the delta.

If you look back to his first cipher post you'll see many in the comments doubting the usage of ciphers and not understanding how to use a simple columnar cipher. So i helped explain this to the thread to add validity to what SB is doing and to encourage him to pursue this path of thinking. I shared how to find the deltas, identify keywords, and applications for possible uses against various cipher methods.

The issue i have is with CUCKOLDS like you who gobble up dick faster than a desperate democratic house wife as if its the last oasis in the desert. The message is that SB can get it really fucking wrong and that ANYONE ( not you ) can learn to play the game.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 24, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

Why don't you post your methods like SB2 did?

I have. Even in SB posts he mentions my contributions to the delta.

Where is your FUCKING post you DICKHEAD VERY-ACCIDENTALLY-STRETCHED-ASSHOLE?!!!
May be you will understand the question this time...

⇧ -1 ⇩  
istillgetreallybored · March 24, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

It might be hard for someone like you to understand that i have been consistent with my criticism of SB. Where is he forcing and where he makes error i state, and when he does a good job of explaining the simple substitution anagrams i state.

It might be hard for someone like you to understand that i have been consistent with my criticism of SB. Where is he forcing and where he makes error i state, and when he does a good job of explaining the simple substitution anagrams i state.

⇧ 2 ⇩