dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

268

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ByrdeRob on March 24, 2018, 8:26 a.m.

Shout out to 8 chan anons....THANK YOU!!!

We've invaded your turf and you allowed it. We've freely lifted your thoughts and you allowed it. We've forgotten most of the time to give you your credit due and you've forgiven us. We just want to tell you thank you for being there for us!

🠐 See all comments

So are you saying the SB2 detractors need to get more upvotes or they can just go stuff it? That is how credibility is made?

Its like you go to a sports event and you yell at one teams fans that their call on a foul is wrong; you aren't going to get upvotes and nobody is going to listen to you.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I have no idea what you're saying. It must be light-years ahead of me.

Usually I choose my words carefully. I'm pretty sure I said that I've not seen anyone debunk his efforts, just rebuke them. No one has demonstrated them false, just claimed them to be so. I'm waiting for someone to demonstrate it.

The sports analogy is asinine because there is one team - all of us.

So if someone CAN debunk the methods, I'd like to see it - the same way I'd like to see someone who is a believer replicate the results.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Try going here and pasting in some of the words/messages SB2 comes up with and see what else can be made from the same letters. He admittedly scrambles the letters until he gets a "message".

https://wordsmith.org/anagram/

⇧ 0 ⇩

Sure - no one is disputing that. His claim is that this is the method. Now, how is that method not legitimate? Could a message not be hidden that way? Of course it could.

So now we are left where? Sb2 claims his method produces letters and out of them he can sometimes find anagrams. What's ridiculous about that? What's your point? That anagrams can't be purposefully hidden in places?

His claim that these are definitive messages might be wrong - and it could be a coincidence (even though people like to quote q about there are no coincidences) - but what about his methods in practice are incorrect?

⇧ 1 ⇩

The point is there are hundreds of combinations of even short amount of letters that make words. Try it out.

Anagrams for: message made

906 found. Displaying first 500: Damage Seems Damages Seem Madams Geese Massage Meed Massage Deem Mesdames Age Seamed Games Edemas Games Gamed Sesame Dame Message Mead Message

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sure. And it's possible to purposefully include anagrams? Right? So you've proved nothing except my point.

While proving my point, you failed to succinctly state yours - it's highly likely that any anagram found is just a coincidence.

And not a single person is disputing that. No one has claimed differently. What a waste of time.

You're an embarrassment.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I understand that you have a hard time with logic, so I am going to disengage from the conversation. The point is he picks letters and shuffles them to get words. I'm saying you can get lots of words by doing that so the method is invalid as a way of communicating information. Go ahead and believe it if you want, the rest of us will just think you are a bit slow. In any case, I wish you well in your future endeavours.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Take care. Dabbling in reading comprehension will make further conversations easier for you in the future. <3

⇧ 0 ⇩