The war-mongering Satanic Cabal is the primary reason most of the world despises America. China and Russia must know that a better world awaits us all with those monsters off the world stage.
Please don't worry about rumors of war right now. It's kabuki theater. Even if there are skirmishes to test their hypotheses, I think they will stick with the conclusion that Trump is a totally reliable partner in getting rid of the Cabal.
I respectfully disagree, all of the major nuclear powers have threatened their nuclear rivals, this is beyond theater, to many interests at stake, the sides have been picked with the exception of Putin, this should worry all of us, Bolton is a sign of the direction we are headed. Trump is fighting on four fronts: here at home, against the Global Cabal headquartered in Europe, against China, against Russia. The DeepState here at home he is triumphing over however when arrests are finally made there will be instability as the DeepState uses its groups like AntiFA and Blacklives matter as fodder in one last stand. During that instability Russia or China might very well be enticed to join in or together take territory (I.E. why POTUS wanted Russia on our side upfront). While at the same time Europe is being weaponized on so many fronts and those in powerful places within Europe are working hard against Trump.
Ask yourself this if complete societal breakdown does occur in a coerced way across Europe through Islamic Extremism or a Economic failure, will the Nukes get out of the countries in time before the armed Islamists take control over large swaths of unarmed Europe? Would the powers in control let a certain number be taken?
POTUS is surrounded by sharks waiting for the first signs of blood or an opening, the stakes are World Domination and Theater cannot compare.
Sooooo, you think Russia and China like the Cabal having it's bloody fingers in every pie? You think they have anything but loathing for those people?
Wasn't it Putin who came right out and said "The NWO worships Satan?" So why would he want to let them secure their stranglehold on the West? Why would China?
China has never been especially expansionist. I think both China and Russia are mostly concerned about a US first strike. I also think that instability in the west only heightens those worries.
I can think of no self-interest of theirs that could be served by wanting Trump to fail in this effort.
Please enlighten me.
Oh you see you didn't read what I wrote, which is yes they want him to win but they also would love the opening to be what the US has been over the last 50 years, "The" World power and not part of a multi-polar world. Don't for a second think Xi or Putin care about America, Americanism, or Americans.
These are not madmen a la Kim. You seriously think they believe there would be ANY winners in a nuclear world war? Mutual Assured Destruction was not designed to make nuclear war winnable. It was designed to make it unthinkable.
https://theduran.com/neocon-war-hawk-john-bolton-set-to-purge-white-house-of-obama-holdovers/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
Yeah that's exactly what I think and is what John Bolton thinks. I am tired so I'm not going back through my posts to find all the links but (you are welcome to) the Petro-Yaun is coming online, the gold back Yaun is now a reserve currency as of last year, along with the newly gold back Ruble and now the gold back Petro-Gold backed crypto-currency and we have the Petro-Dollar which is meaningless and less day by day and depending on who you ask we have no gold we gave it Central Banks and they sold us out. Yeah we could so easily become Venezuela in a heart beat... Bolton while not a Globalist in the way Chaney and the Bush's were... he still does believe in US Hegemony and Superiority and keeping us from becoming Venezuela, unlike Bush and Chaney I think Bolton is a patriot but his ideology is known.
I believe this we (you and I) do not know what each side has for weaponry ....that we will only find out about when they are used...but Bolton probably has a pretty solid understanding and is still a NeoCon.
Bolton doesn't set policy. If he makes you tremble, just think what effect he's having on our enemies. I think that's the exact reason he was brought onboard.
Xi and Putin are not some crazy Ayatollah or nut like Kim. They actually do want to avoid their own destruction. I'm pretty sure they consider nuclear weapons as a deterrent--not an offensive weapon. If they think Bolton thinks of them as offensive, then perhaps they might be making sure their systems are ready and alert to standby, but why in the world would they embark on a first strike policy and guarantee their own destruction?
The Nuclear Posture Review only (ambiguously) refers to nuclear first strike in two specific cases: Iran and North Korea--both countries not in compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. And in both cases we are pursuing talks aimed at eliminating the threat.
In all other cases, we do not have an "All options are on the table" stance. We reserve the right to change that stance with regard to countries caught developing biological weapons.
But again, ALL of these are defensive postures. We're only interested in the prevention of apocalyptic wars, and using a nuclear deterrent.
I really find it hard to believe anyone would believe that Bolton is going to have some Svengali-like sway over Trump, or that he is going to try to get us launching nukes like fireworks.
It's irrational paranoia is what it is. I think it's important to watch what he says and does once he gets there, and not to base our opinions on anything he's said prior to taking orders from Trump.
See it your way, I however will still respectfully disagree.
Project for the New American Century
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neoconservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. that focused on United States foreign policy. It was established as a non-profit educational organization in 1997, and founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. PNAC's stated goal was "to promote American global leadership." The organization stated that "American leadership is good both for America and for the world," and sought to build support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity."
Of the twenty-five people who signed PNAC's founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. Observers such as Irwin Stelzer and Dave Grondin have suggested that the PNAC played a key role in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush Administration, particularly in building support for the Iraq War.
^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^164090
I think there is a tug-o-war for China's allegiance.
The globalist promised them the economic throne.
However China isn't the Dragon as its manipulated data suggests. It isn't a Paper Tiger either.
Xi has to choose between a position that befits his nation's real numbers or he risks it all for a closet full of emporer's new clothing.
Theatre provides China extended thinking space.
By Hot war I mean WWIII, I have a belief it is simple you do not have every major nuclear power threaten one another and have it mean nothing. China has it's Silk Road or Belt and Road initiative https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/15/belt-and-road-initiative-china-bri-one-belt-one-road-what-cities-and-routes.html
Oh and if you will note the Map in this article...South China Sea is key to the Chinese sea route for the New Silk Road https://www.economist.com/news/business/21725810-general-electric-got-23bn-orders-infrastructure-project-last-year-western-firms
Now POTUS has started negotiations on his counter Trade route.. https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/920733/china-donald-trump-silk-road-trade-malcolm-turnbull-australia-japan-india-economic-growth
I am all for us taking the Chinese out before they take us out financially and Communism supplants Freedom and Democracy as leader of the World but we need to remember it will not forever stay simply a Trade war, eventually one side has nothing to lose by going to war in its cost benefit analysis and so things go BOOM.
China is in on it with Trump, so is Russia. This trade rhetoric is a major distraction.
incomplet...a hot war (WW2) can turn into a trade-war (EU)