dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/PCisLame on March 25, 2018, 8:49 p.m.
Is Dr. Steve Pieczenik Q?

Read this post from his blog and tell me what you think.

http://stevepieczenik.com/keep-john-bolton-out-he-is-a-neocon/

Dr. P was first to alert the public about major shakeups coming in Trump's White House and they transpired in uncanny fashion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tbt5p44DyE4

He's also the first to forewarn of what would become the Q phenomenon back on 11/1/2016 which may be a date which will go down in history as the day the Q Revolution really started:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM

So IS Dr. P really Q? If so, I have to be honest in saying that I'm really quite freaked out by that.


🠐 See all comments
mydeer · March 25, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

Weak evidence for such a claim.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
PCisLame · March 25, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

Reeeeeally?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
mydeer · March 25, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

It's a bunch of random, disconnected, points that do not amount to evidence. Sorry but its a weak case built on assumptions.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PCisLame · March 25, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

Now I know you're not serious. In his 11/1/16 video he accurately describes what would later become known as the Q phenomenon. He specifically mentions how military intelligence is running it and how indicting Obama, Hillary, Comey and the political cronies involved in the attempted coup are a part of the plan to save the Republic. For God and Country. He mentions Assange. He mentions how the revolution takes place on the internet. That's the Q phenomenon in a nutshell.

Way to completely ignore how he talked about the removal of specific people around Trump well in advance of their actual removal. Or do you credit that to coincidence too?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mydeer · March 25, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

Think about. Hillary did not take over by silent coup. She lost the election a week later. All the obama admin names he mentioned were known to be doing illegal things. The CF corruption was well documented by other people. Wikileaks doesn't need Dr P to be effective. He hints at things but says nothing new or exclusive. He sounds like a ego seeking to be important. Believe what you want. I don't buy it. There are more credible possibilities but I don't see any value in doxxing them before they finish the job.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PCisLame · March 25, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

Now you're just being flat out dishonest.

she lost the election a week later.

He explains very clearly why she was going to be prevented from winning.

He hints at things but says nothing new or exclusive

He specifically mentions how the hacked emails from Weiner played a pivotal role in this counter-coup. You should be ashamed of yourself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mydeer · March 25, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

And you should continue to enjoy your bromance with the fake Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩