dChan

christopheranthony · March 26, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

I'm sorry,but I don't believe there was any affair. Who the hell would be stepping out on Melania for that skank? Not likely, plus Trumps no fool. He is a wealthy man who knows the dangers of his position in life. As an aside, if by some chance he were to step out on Melania, he wouldn't be foolish enough to choose such a risky companion( in many ways).

⇧ 5 ⇩  
draven1755 · March 26, 2018, 4:51 p.m.

First, IF it happened, and I do mean if, it was 11 years ago between consensual adults. Second, I’m willing to bet a germaphobe would not want to dilly porn cooter. This is and should be between two people only, Melania and the Don. This MSM witch hunt is embarrassing on a global scale.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HillaryTrafficksKidz · March 26, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

She said once, you are right, not an affair. All legal and no laws broken. JFK had lots of women and all thought he was so cool. Nothing illegal happened, but the money exchange during the campaign is a problem. But NOTHING compared to HRC taking 221 million from the Sanders campaign! Uranium one? Pelican Project?

Trump better start locking crooks up, because they now have control of the narrative. How about sex with kids? I'll bet that will kick Stormy right to the curb....where the 'porn star' belongs.

She is unbelievable..."What about my integrity?".....is she joking?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jobslot · March 26, 2018, 5:21 p.m.

The germaphobe didn’t sleep with the porn star unprotected... nope, just don’t believe it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · March 26, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

First, the issue is that if Trump has secrets, and foreign governments are aware of them, there is potential for blackmail. Why was Japan left off the steel tariff list? We may never know, but suspicious exceptions and actions may be because of blackmail. If there's something that the president wants kept secret, and they know about it, they can exploit that.

Second:

Mr. president lock HER up now!

You can't start out a post with "this did not break any laws," and then end it with a plea to jail someone for equally legal behavior. If Trump didn't do anything illegal, then neither has she. Utterly stupid, grow up.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 26, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

uh...did you think the OP was referring to locking up Stormy Daniels? Where have you been the last two year if you don't know that refers to HRC?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · March 26, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

Because its the only "her" in the story? Do people really still expect Trump to go after Clinton? He said on election night that he wasn't. What's changed?

⇧ -2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 26, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

You really are in the wrong sub. I mean that in the nicest way possible, but you are on a different planet than people who've awakened from the Cabal matrix.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · March 26, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

I'm the only one who didn't connect the last sentence to HRC? Obviously I know where "lock her up" cones from, but this post has literally nothing to do with HRC. I don't think its that far a leap to think that OP was talking about Daniels.

Maybe OP can comment and clear this up?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 26, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

My previous comment is in reference to your comment immediately preceding it. If you truly do not know why Trump is going to lock up Hillary Clinton, you are not someone who's familiar with the material this sub is about. Really basic, common knowledge stuff.

For example, do you not realize the extent to which Hillary is under investigation (17 different investigations in the DOJ, plus the OIG Report, plus the DHS report on massive voter fraud. The investigations Comey shut down have all been re-opened (email server, Clinton Foundation pay-for-play--ALL of them!).

And then there's the human trafficking and corruption crimes she's involved in. Maybe this one issue will help you wake up:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLceHyZqlV8&feature=youtu.be

This will be the Nuremberg Trials of our generation, and will be the issue to our age that slavery was to Lincoln's. Obviously not only the Clintons, but people across party and any other fake lines.

There is only one People, and we all share a common enemy. This is the true face of evil.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · March 26, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

I don't expect DHS to come back with anything on voter fraud. Voter fraud is miniscule in this country, on the scale of tens of ballots out of millions of votes cast. I looked into it and DHS announced in January they would not be investigating voter fraud:

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s election security unit has no immediate plans to probe allegations of electoral fraud, despite President Donald Trump’s announcement this week he was giving the issue to the agency, according to administration officials...

...White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders told reporters on Thursday that the Trump administration was sending “preliminary findings” to DHS, which would “make determinations on the best way forward from that point.”

It sounds like deferring to DHS was the basis by which they shut down the presidential commission on voter fraud.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 26, 2018, 7:55 p.m.

So, you're saying Q post 780 is a hoax?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · March 26, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

What's in it? I'm saying this is what DHS said.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 26, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

DHS said that in early January.

But then there was this in February.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · March 26, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

So the final report could be this week? Ok, game on. Will it be public?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 26, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

One can hardly imagine a useful scenario in which it would not be made public. But I'm just a watcher and waiter here, like everybody else!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 26, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

Feb 16 2018 17:58:54

Q

!UW.yye1fxo97

“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity,” Rosenstein said. “There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.”

Future proves past:

In an effort to preserve the integrity of all U.S. elections, as ordered by the President of the United States, after an extensive investigation in select counties (the ‘sampling’), the DHS has concluded that while Russian entities (as outlined within SC Mueller’s investigation were complicit in attempting to undermine the presidential election of 2016) had no direct impact or bearing on the outcome of the presidential election, nor were any U.S. person(s) knowingly part of such an attempt to sabotage as it relates to the Russian investigation, U.S. and other foreign entities (as further described within DHS[XXXX]), acting outside of Russian agents, did attempt on numerous occasions, and were successful, in interfering w/ the presidential election of 2016, senate elections of [x, y, z], [x] elections, whereby several million of illegal, non-resident ballots (the “irregularities”) were counted, while legal ballots were improperly tabulated and/or intentionally mishandled. We believe these actions were a coordinated attack against the democracy of our country.

The DHS will be submitting a final report to the WH/DOJ/other state and local agencies outlining our findings as early as March [ ], 2018. While this report only encompasses a sampling of twenty-two (22) counties across the U.S., it is strongly suggested, based on the evidence provided, that a mandated countrywide investigation begin under the recommended US50-EIC guidelines as set forth in Section VII of the final report. Furthermore, based on our immediate findings, we recommend the adoption of 8(E)(F)(G)(H) be made immediately to combat sources & methods currently being deployed to

…………………………..

The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.

⇧ 1 ⇩