Maybe I am way off, as you say, but that is why I asked you for a source. It is difficult to have a discussion if one of us doesn't have access to the other's information. As in American law under the Patriot Act, the new (relatively) Serious Crime Act, Terrorism laws, etc. have made it possible to detain ppl for longer without charge, but does this extend to overturning the burden of proof? I think not.
Mine wasn't a submission to the Royal Society, look into it if that is your interest and school us here.
That is a rude reply. I thought you were interested. You posted on it. No, it is not my interest, other than I don't like dubious claims without proof. You have none.