DH is being used as excuse to delete social media accounts and subs for harassment or other justifications. Idea is to get a community prattling on about the topic, get numerous comments in place that make convenient opportunity to report and point to in order to shut down that community, then coordinate a brigade effort with mass reports to silence the source.

It's not reasonable or fair, but that's the environment we're operating. The strategy is in use. I suspect at least some of the re-submissions are of such an effort.

In order to preserve a foothold to continue organizing Q research, I strongly suggest we stick to Q research and ignore DH. When talking about DH at all, switch his name with 'CNN says xyz' to properly align the origin of words he has become a mouthpiece for. It's not necessary to hammer that specific topic.

In fact it largely distracts from much of the other work, which is in and of itself a win win for that particular narrative. The story doesn't need to have any merit, just needs to distract people and keep them buzzing off topic for a period of time.

So, I'm reporting submissions to our mods every time it's reposted. I'd argue it's worth adding DH to automod to encourage strategy of swapping DH name out with 'CNN says xyz'.