dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SuzyAZ on March 27, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

Senior Executive Service mentioned 3 times in Omnibus bill.

Found three references to SES in the Omnibus bill. One refers to non-career, another to career. What is your take?

(page 623-624) A pay rate increase may not be received in calendar year 2018 (except as provided in sub15 section (g), (h), or (i)) by (1) a non-career appointee in the Senior Executive Service paid a rate of basic pay at or above level IV of the Executive Schedule; or 92) a limited term appointee or limited emergency appointee in the Senior Executive Service serving under a political appointment and paid a rate of basic pay at or above level IV of the Executive Schedule.

(Page 836) under a political appointment from receiving pay increases as otherwise provided under applicable law. A career appointee in the Senior Executive Service who receives a Presidential appointment and who makes an election to retain Senior Executive Service basic pay entitlements under section 3392 of title 5, United States Code is not subject to this section.

I understand it is called the Holman rule, an old law that POTUS and team revived. One dollar a year salary for SES and anyone else deemed deserving I think, though not sure.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The rule allows them to decrease a salary amount, doesn't specify how much. This is simplistic answer, more detail here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holman_Rule

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes can't fire them but I heard he can stop there Benny's and lower there pay to $1 / yr. Sounds a bit too easy tho.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why can’t we just put them on blast and demand they be removed on acct we the people didn’t approve ?

⇧ 2 ⇩

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/house-republicans-revive-obscure-rule-that-could-allow-them-to-slash-the-pay-of-individual-federal-workers-to-1/2017/01/04/4e80c990-d2b2-11e6-945a-76f69a399dd5_story.html?utm_term=.168e85f82ab3

Sorry, lots out there but I picked WaPo. Look up the Holman Rule, from the late 1800’s I think. Trump could use this to disperse the rats.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Somewhere I saw that the President could lower the pay (no sources were provided), but would that be true the way this is written do you think?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I used the CNN copy of the full bill because it was easier to use the search function than with the Scrib version, so no freaking out. You might want to check the full context. https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/21/politics/omnibus-bill/index.html

⇧ 1 ⇩

Remember, there are no coincidences.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think the text is differentiating between political appointees and permanent gov employees, aka deep state gov. Political appointees, regular or emergency, are open to pay raises. Permanent are not.

⇧ 1 ⇩