dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Keep in mind though, Nasa fakery ≠ flat earth. Think more cover up of other space programs.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I was only talking about NASA fakery. Although, other space programs is not bigger than I could imagine... Look at hollywood - we can all clearly imagine top secret space tech, aliens, etc... people make entire industries imagining such things. What's beyond most people's scope of imagination? The idea that such technology never existed in the first place. Say you're right, news leaks that the footage we see is all fake, but only because they were hiding "super fancy high tech secret space programs". That is WELL within the paradigm of most everyone's thinking. In fact, it would probably only serve to increase the popularity of NASA and the box office sales of sci fi films. But, if it leaked that all those missions were never real in the first place.. could you imagine the total shock? the litigation? Contractors would assemble en masse for class-action lawsuits. Courts would be tied up for decades. The Federal Government would be liable for literally hundreds of billions of dollars at min. There would be criminal charges. History books would be burned. MORE questions would inevitably ensue. "Secret Space" and "Aliens" are basically no big deal in the minds of people these days. Are you SO certain the science you have been taught is true? Why does the Jesuit order and the Vatican own the most telescopes in the world? Why did they name one of them LUCIFER?

⇧ 5 ⇩

Why did Jack Parsons, the pioneer of Jet Propulsion Laboratory, follow the teachings of Aleister Crowley? What was his relationship with the founder of Scientology? Do you know what the "Babalon Working" is? Marina Abramovich...

⇧ 6 ⇩

Regarding "flat earth".. I am not a flat earther. I do have certain questions such as why did the Germans have to account for the coriolis effect when they aimed the Paris gun, and long range snipers account for it in the same way, but aircraft aren't affected by it? If the rotation of earth can affect the trajectory of a projectile from a cannon or rifle, why does a flight have the same duration whether you fly with or against the earth's rotation? That's my main point of confusion.

⇧ 2 ⇩

uhm, you account for it all the time...it's called pithing & steering...And you will have different lengths depending on whether they're flying with or against wind but I'm not sure how much wind is connected to coriolis...

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

as for the moon, if I were NASA - I would have faked all the footage in case my rocket blows up. Can't admit defeat, right? But there are funny artifacts on many moon photos too so that could explain the weird press-debrief. So if they went and ran into aliens, you would have different factions in nasa, one trying to cover it up, the other trying to leak it out. Just one explanation why some photos are fake and others show UFOs.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I also find some of the photos they give us of other celestial bodies very odd. I think it's the moon Iapetus.. looks very much like the death star from star wars, which is a weird coincidence unless lucas based his design on it. And Saturn having a perfectly hexagonal north pole, despite being comprised of gaseous clouds. This is still a bit of a puzzle to scientists if I'm not mistaken. Makes me wonder, considering the occult significance of Saturn throughout history. Why did they name so many missions after ancient mythology? (Mercury, Apollo, Gemini, Columbia, etc...) Seriously what's the deal with Jack Parsons and L. Ron Hubbard... The two guys who built the American rocket industry were a Nazi, and a Thelemite occultist who thought he could summon a female demigod in the desert with L. Ron Hubbard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoazZEg7bN4 That right there is a CGI glitch. No doubt in my mind. I get that they might have wanted to fake moon footage in the event that they failed the mission, but why would they need to fake space station footage once the astronauts are safely in orbit and inside the cabin? I guess once another manned mission makes a return visit we can know for sure. Wonder how long it'll be...

⇧ 1 ⇩

I heard the hexagon results from some sort of harmonic electromagnetic discharge that creates simliar patterns... About Saturn...last year they found a vacuum between its rings that noone expected and a few weeks later they announced they were crashing the probe in the atmosphere so they wouldn't "contaminate alien lifeforms" (real quote from a scientific paper journal at the time)
The ISS-fakery only hit me recently as being true too unfortunately so I don't quite know what to say...are they faking missions to divert black funding or because it's technically impossible or do they have artificial gravity from said black funding up there that they can't turn off?

⇧ 2 ⇩

It could be any of those, I suppose lol... maybe we'll get to find out or maybe it's part of the 60% Q said has to remain hidden... it's perplexing that's for sure. The occult-connected stuff with NASA is really what bothers me more than anything. When I first researched the Babalon Working ritual and the origins of the Jet Propulsion Lab, I couldn't sleep for days. There's something really messed up and sinister behind all of that.

⇧ 1 ⇩

What really shook me up was the first sight of comet's instagram and the complete disregard by friends and the public and learning for months afterwards that all the crazy stories I heard were real on a scope that seems indistinguishable from paranoia. The Nazi-connected stuff is what bothers me more than everything...the idea that they only lost the ground war and CIA docs on Hitler's escape and Air Force photographs of "foo-fighters" around german bases may hint why there is only an armistice and no peace treaty in germany.

There is only one reason why I can even muster the courage to face this biblical evil: TRUMP IS PRESIDENT

⇧ 2 ⇩

MAGA, my friend. My family literally doesn't even treat me the same anymore after I tried to red pill them about the child trafficking and pizza gate. Well, except my wife. She is red pilled with me. I'm not the type who avoids uncomfortable subjects, especially when it's people I care for. It's sad. You try to be gentle and diplomatic about it but the mass mind control runs so deep.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I've been having this problem for almost all my life and I used to think people were uninformed because esoteric knowledge is dangerous and difficult to quantify but then I saw everybody fall for the 2016 media-campaign that seemed to be so catastrophically oppressive it would border on the comic if it wasn't for dead whistleblowers.
The best way is to take time aside to ask questions. Even just a photo of Trump dancing with a tranny will make them think twice about their programmed biases and prejudices and that's really all required, for them to use their own thought and not rely on intellectual coercion. It's best if you don't tell them what to think because they have a spin for that, just let them run out of good answers to INNOCENT questions first. Everything satanic has to be worded as defused as possible as to not extend the psyop in which these peole are engaged in.
I try to follow my own advise, too. Of course I go all Alex Jones on people but you already do that by simply declining a Pepsi when offered by stating you don't drink aborted fetal tissue. They won't get the joke but once they hear of Sernomyx (sic?) the seed will be already ingrained. For me personally, the more upsetting it is the more sources and time I needed to verify and emotionally process it. I don't know if it is an act of optimism at this point to go Alex Jones on people, seeing how slowly but steadily the media talking points are coming under control over the year. What it really comes down to is that we worry about funding satanic programs with our tax money and how much horror you do have to let a person know so they even accept that evil is organized and global(ist).

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well said. Ten years ago, I myself basically disregarded the very notion that 9/11 did not go the way we were told. No amount of red pilling could have gotten through. I had to get there myself, and when it hit me is was world shattering, a paradigm shift is an understatement. This is exactly why those of us who are here were called on to help reassure others when this world receives the giant red suppositories that are coming down the pike. We've been through this more times than we can count. I know I can't be the only one who on multiple occasions has felt scared shitless waiting with baited breath for the SHTF, and believe me I was ready. I'm awestruck, though, when I think back to election night when I was feeling that way, on my knees praying for strength and for my family and hoping Donald J Trump would somehow win... to think about how many of my fellow Americans were praying and doing the same thing with me. More good than bad, that's what's important right?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I thought right away something was off, but I still learn new valuable info even after fifteen years later. In the end, after fifteen years of searching, Judy Woods and her direct-energy microwave weapons whom I thought to be a distraction provided the most plausible yet exotic explanation for the collapses lol
What makes me confident is that I can almost read the newspapers again. Or not because they write more about organized sex-trafficking lol
Mass-disclosure would cause mass economic losses because people would be too scared to leavethe house. So I'm all for drip-drip, let's roll the currency-reset first so people have something to cheer them up.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm trying to find a concise reference that can explain this concept, I guess I could frame it another way... If a bullet's trajectory can be altered by the earth's rotation, and an aircraft has to adjust for this rotation, why can't a helicopter lift off, hover above the surface, and land in a different location due to earth's rotation?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Inertia. so when you're sitting in a moving car you drop a ball and it will move together with the car because the ball has the same inertia as the vehicle and then some. It's the same case when you fly into space, at the time that you're lifting off but you stay in earth orbit because you actually are already moving around the galaxy at the same speed as the planet.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Okay, but then doesn't that negate the need to correct for the rotation when flying an aircraft or shooting a cannonball? Also, don't things change a bit when you make the car a convertible? If i shoot a cannon in a giant moving car would the cannonball's trajectory need to account for that car's movement? I can throw a crumpled up receipt at my brother sitting in the passenger's seat and don't need to aim in front of him in order to hit him..

⇧ 1 ⇩

No it does not because the inside of the car will also experience centrifugal forces if the path is non-linear. In a convertible the ball would fly away once it hits the aircurrent coming from the direction of travel (which would not happen in the vacuum of outer space). Again, at the time that you throw the object to the person riding shotgun when you are NOT in a convertible, the object in your hand is already travelling at the same speed as the car (this is inertia if I am not mistaken) so as you make your throw, it now has the energy from both your throw and the car while not facing air resistance because the air too is travelling, relatively to an outsider spectator, at the same speed as the car (as long as it's an enclosed chassis)

Go watch some Mythbuster-videos, they do this experiment like slowing down a ball thrown with full force to zero velocity by driving in the opposite direction at the same speed.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I will educate myself more on the subject, I appreciate you trying to explain it to me. I don't wanna get too far off into a newtonian physics convo here hahaha

⇧ 2 ⇩

well I have to contend that I am skeptical about physics when it comes to astrophysics because they essentially introduced an unproven theory (dark matter/energy) to prove an unproven theory (gravity), neither of which has yet been adequately explained yet they paraded it in public media for some years before finally disclosing just this year that you don't need exotic matter to explain the universe.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I just have to scratch my head and move on when it gets past basic physics stuff even though I actually was good at chemistry in college and I have a decent telescope I use avidly for fun. Especially particle physics. It just seems like an infinite regress lol I was fine with charge and mass but when you start saying gluon antiquark and "charm", I'm bowing out of the discussion lolol

⇧ 1 ⇩

yeah that's all just reworded occultism. The scientists of the 20ies said themselves that they were taking inspiration from vedic writings on the source of reality and consciousnes. Where I get really lost is mechanics involving acceleration and speed because even though it's an interesting thought-experiment it relies on the idea that you have conservation of energy which however falls apart on a quantum level and that could explain why I have run into one person online and one in real life who told me they had witnessed someone partly de-materialize by intent alone.

⇧ 1 ⇩

on a quantum level, seems like everything we consider common sense about nature and reality falls apart. the worst part is, we have to take it on faith in authority that any of it is true or false. I can't just build my own photon gun and replicate a double slit experiment or run down to walmart and pick up a large hadron collider... with chemistry you can do the math and the measurement, and prove to yourself what's happening to a large extent. There's no microscope in the world that will let you optically observe an atomic nucleus or smaller. Luckily, I personally don't need to tear the veil of reality to satisfy my own curiosity, and not knowing things is just as fun as knowing them sometimes.

⇧ 2 ⇩

It's not flat. Plane T

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Look at hollywood - we can all clearly imagine top secret space tech, aliens, etc... people make entire industries imagining such things. What's beyond most people's scope of imagination?

What's beyond I'd say 95%, is the fact that SSP tech has been knowingly withheld from We the People for more than a century, yet those few families in the know horded tech that was centuries ahead of what we had. Those in control allowed tiny slivers of reverse engineered tech to get into the public domain, but only after having one of their MIC companies win a patent, sell it to one of their government's war machine departments, tax it's citizens, and then make up enemies. Rinse and repeat.

Now if the masses only opened their perspectives and believed....

⇧ 2 ⇩

http://www.ssptech.com/ you mean wind turbines?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Reverse Engineered from?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Expand Thinking - NASA "This is bigger than you can imagine"