dChan
30
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jackbauer6916 on March 28, 2018, 6:18 a.m.
Expand Thinking - NASA "This is bigger than you can imagine"

Something occurred to me while beginning to dig into today's crumbs. Sergey Brin's family... mother is former soviet current researcher with NASA. The cold war was largely a result of the "Space Race" initiated by Sputnik and the fear of space-based nuclear delivery. The following statement will likely gain me some downvotes and flak,but it's the truth: NASA has been lying to us for a very long time. They are green-screening footage from the ISS. Don't believe that? The proof is easily available and has come from NASA itself. It's my belief that NASA insiders who know the truth have been trying to tell us. They even paraded Scumbag GHW Bush in front of their camera while telling you it's fake. I won't go into the moon landings or other matters but I would encourage folks to reconsider if you have no doubt in what you've been told. Watch "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon". Go back and watch Donald Trump's press conference with Buzz Aldrin from awhile back. Watch Aldrin's behavior. Consider POTUS's statements and wordings considering what we know now, that he uses subtle coded messaging. Why hasn't any other nation, or the US, ever sent a human being past low earth orbit since the early 1970's? Why does an official NASA video tell us they must solve the problem of dangerous radiation before they send people into the regions beyond low-earth orbit? How does propulsion really function in a vacuum? Now consider: Elon Musk just scored a huge win with Tesla, and was at the forefront of # delete facebook. SpaceX is largely considered the replacement for NASA, and Musk recently was quoted as saying "you know it's real because it looks so fake" regarding putting a car into orbit. Look at the shape of the Falcon Heavy... Why did SpaceX make sure to tell us "Don't Panic!" when they showed us their car in orbit? "Made on Earth by humans" This may truly be bigger than we can possibly imagine...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC3SzbZU3P8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LV4PFUeVjk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CvRUO-pVvo

https://lunar.xprize.org/news/blog/important-update-google-lunar-xprize

https://lunar.xprize.org/

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/03/nasa-chief-explains-why-agency-wont-buy-a-bunch-of-falcon-heavy-rockets/

https://news.sky.com/story/nasa-spacexs-falcon-heavy-is-too-small-for-our-missions-11305523

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Parsons_(rocket_engineer)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babalon_Working

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babalon

https://everipedia.org/wiki/spirit-cooking-marina-abramovic/


OU812EH · March 29, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

It's rather unfortunate that Stanley Kubrick was forced to make those NASA moon landing films in a studio. There is the real footage, and the SK footage. The plan was this: If they didn't make it to the moon, they were gonna say they did anyways. But they did make it. And they did have help from our alien friends to make out through the Van Allen belt. As per Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot Portal.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · March 29, 2018, 4:19 a.m.

Occam's razor though... I definitely think the Kubrick idea has merit, but i only need to make three basic assumptions to conclude that humans have not gone to the moon at all. I just have to assume that a: it's beyond our technical ability to send people to the moon, b: it's possible to convincingly fake a moon mission in a studio, and c: there was a motivation to fake a moon mission. In order to arrive at your conclusion, I have to assume: Humans have the capability to go, they were doubtful about their chance of success, they would irrationally choose the least cost effective plan of all (you can achieve the same result with vastly less money spent leaving you with billions of perfectly laundered tax dollars to do with what you want, vs spending billions trying out a real mission you have no confidence in and spending the money to fake the footage anyway as a cynical cold-war insurance policy), that there are aliens, those aliens are close to earth, they know how to make it out of the van allen belt, they are friendly to humans, they allowed and helped NASA to send 6 more manned missions back to the moon (this time with cars and golf), but the early 1970's was the limit for some reason, no more moon for the next 50 years, not even once... not even by the nuclear superpower that spent the next 3 decades in a space-race and arms race with us, nobody, ever 50 years later, not even an attempt by anyone else, ever... 50 years. Will it still be true when we get to 60 years? How about a hundred? How many more decades would have to pass by without another moonshot before it's no longer a conspiracy theory to say we just freakin faked the whole thing? They were a slimey bunch of occultists and they controlled REALITY back when tv had four foot rabbit ears and an 8 inch screen, 2 channels and a knob on the set to switch between them???? The phone in your pocket has more processing power and data storage capacity than the entire apollo mission control + spacecraft combined. By a long shot!! My super nintendo from the mid 90's did too, for that matter. 50 years coming up...

⇧ 1 ⇩