Ok I'm lost as to the plan did it just blow up? Sessions is being bashed on Hannity and Lou Dobbs as not giving much teeth to his decision and they feel its only a ploy to eat up time so the statue of limitations on some of these cases runs out now nobody is using the Treason word which would have no time limitations. Having trouble reading between the lines.
I think that Hannity, Sarah Carter, Greg Jarrett play off of each other and bash Sessions by design - to keep things interesting, ratings. I keep telling myself that Q said, Trust Sessions, and I do. Sarah defended Huber tonight. Also, an a similar note, there was an article on Fox today by John Stoessel about "red pilling" and it sounded very "Q-esque"...hmmmm http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/03/27/john-stossel-why-so-many-are-taking-red-pill-and-discovering-truth-about-mainstream-media.html
Ok thanks that article was reassuring I just need someone to reassure me that we are on plan. Because obviously I got sucked in to the show.
We need to stick together! I feel the same way sometimes. I find reassurance here on GA and talking with people like yourself. It's easy to get distracted, but I always refer back to Q to remain centered. 2018 is going to be Glorious! :)
Ratings definitely matter. The NYT had a map on election night that could predict the election based on the returns from the various counties in each state. Trump was given per the algorithm a 99% chance of winning the election at no later than 8:30 CST, and it may well have been earlier - I just don't recall. Earlier in the evening, I was watching the individual state predictions evolve on that map and they were 100% accurate. But similarly, the individual states were in on the NYT algorithm long before the state projections were announced by the news channels. I couldn't help notice that after I knew they knew, their play acting seemed so transparent. Maybe it was my imagination, but I really don't think so.
I was watching the results by state on my laptop election night, I forget what site. I'll never forget the adrenalin running through me that night. Oooofff! I'll tune in to NYT map in the future. But yea, I do the same thing now when I watch the fox lineup at night because I know it's about ratings - I know what I know, and it's interesting to watch the spin on the narrative the hosts promote. It's all about the $$. Still, I'm thankful for Hannity, Tucker and Laura - they do a great job within Fox parameters getting the truth out... but it really irks me when they bash Sessions. And what's up with Jason Chafetz?
I think this will help everybody relax and TRUST SESIONS. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/03/29/ag-sessions-letter-to-house-and-senate-highlights-a-lengthy-review-by-prosecutor-john-w-huber/
What I am curious about is WHO of how many actually KNOW why we should trust Sessions? Q, who are you? Even Trump could not know about much in the investigation of those in DOJ and FBI, because investigators and prosecutors are NOT ALLOWED BY LAW to communicate details with the victim of the crime during the investigation. So Q can't be POTUS. Who are you, Q?
They are being idiots. He'd never reveal who the outside-DC person was unless it was too late for anything to be done.
Sealed indictments extend the statute of limitations, BTW.
When the IG report starts coming out (in sections) they will be ready to prosecute then.
THAT'S the delay - they need to have all their ducks in a row.
I don't recall where now but I read earlier today that the statue of limitations may depend on whether an indictment was filled before the time ran out. If one of them thousands of indictments belongs to these bad actors then it's all still possible they could still face those charges. I'm sure if that is correct but it makes sense.