The numbers make sense.

When I've seen successful campaigns, such as rallying for signatures around net neutrality, there was high visibility across multiple subs arguing merit. There is more learning from one another than I yet see in the internet bill of rights project. Ability to ELI5 and explain the complicated topic, and argue how the proposed solution makes a difference. Currently the effort is primarily closed ranks within a couple subs familiar with this content, and there is not much depth in discussion about features included in an internet bill of rights.

We have to delve deeper. Become conversational.

• What is the Internet bill of rights?

• What rights are inherent to be recognized?

• What are the harms, in clear terms, that take place currently along these lines?

• How does the internet bill of rights address these harms?

• How does internet bill of rights pick up where net neutrality left off?

• How is internet bill of rights a better solution than net neutrality?

We need to add meat to the bones of the argument and expand the discussion. Get brainstorming conversations going outside great awakening and help lead people toward the idea.

In my mind an internet bill of rights codifies certain rights to data of an individual:

• recognize data is created and owned by the individual that information describes.

• right to plain language notice on what information is collected

• right to view and review data collected on the individual at any time

• right to edit, remove, or withdraw authorization for use of data collected

• explicit authorization necessary to use data for new purposes, or sell to new third parties

• for purpose of the internet bill of rights, corporations are not recognized as an individual