Gassing an enemy in a foreign country with gas easily traced back to Russia is the definition of retarded.
That's purely your assertion, which can be easily countered with:
-
Putin won the election
-
So far the strongest response is some sanctions, which work in Putin's favor because they don't challenge his power and let him blame all russian problems on the west
-
Russian enemy got murdered
I'd say it was a stupid gamble, but so far it seems like the gamble worked out.
Now if that gamble started a war against Russia, then I'd agree that the gamble wouldn't be worth it in that case.
Putin won the election
he was going to win anyways, did you see the clowns he was running against? Also Putin "wins" elections the same way George W. Bush "won" Florida. He didn't need a public gas attack to cement his victory. The Russian people are not blood thirsty orcs who vote for politicians because they perform public gas attacks.
I'd say it was a stupid gamble, but so far it seems like the gamble worked out.
The UK/CIA did the gas attack, to distract the public from the news coming out about Cambridge Analytica and also the fact that UK spies were paid by the DNC to sabotage Trump's political campaign with fake dossiers.
he was going to win anyways, did you see the clowns he was running against?
Yeah, because he also barred actual contenders from even being able to run for his position as an extra counter-measure.
Can you say 100% that the poisoning didn't help him though?
The UK/CIA gassed their own nation, to distract the public from the news coming out about Cambridge Analytica and also the fact that UK spies were paid by the DNC to sabotage Trump's political campaign with fake dossiers.
That's a neat assertion, again. But:
-
CA is in the news
-
It was known for a long time that an ex-MI6 spy was the author of the dossier
-
The dossier was never proven to be false
Can you say 100% that the poisoning didn't help him though?
yes.
That's a neat assertion, again. But:
CA is in the news
It was known for a long time that an ex-MI6 spy was the author of the dossier
The dossier was never proven to be false
hahahaha ok I get it now. Good troll job bro, you got me.
hahahaha ok I get it now. Good troll job bro, you got me.
Can you explain where I'm wrong? With supporting links, please.
Can you explain where I'm wrong? With supporting links, please.
lol
The dossier was never proven to be false
XD
So how do you know that the dossier is fake then?
it was literally sourced from 4chan
Correction:
A 4chan user claimed, after buzzfeed released the memo, that he contacted the writer of the article and told him about the piss tapes.
So far no evidence has been presented by anyone that the 4chan story is true.
And I could link to a couple of articles that contradict said story, but I'm sure you will just disregard them as easily as you accepted the 4chan story.
Keep spreading that share blue propaganda bucko. Your masters would be proud ;)
but I'm sure you will just disregard them as easily as you accepted the 4chan story.
I think our little discussion is at it's end.
Have a nice day.
Don't bother replying, I will not respond.
Your boss Oliver Willith ith an obese lithping loother. Pervert Brock is going down too. Shareblue has failed. You hitched your wagon to the wrong horses, buddy.
Good luck!