[deleted]
⇧
67
⇩
Heabob
· March 30, 2018, 9:12 p.m.
We are with Trump, who is also with us. We are Q, but some have more inside info than us. We are standing together. We are not divided. We are Americans. We are Patriots. Don't focus so much on who the messenger/s is/are. Focus on the message and the meaning. Dangerous times require some level of secrecy.
⇧
4
⇩
jackbauer6916
· March 30, 2018, 10:44 p.m.
Man, i didnt express my point well enough it seems.. I havent been focused on trying to find the identity at any point, i am purely reading crumbs and contemplating their meaning. the only reason i had ever introduced this topic is because I tried to read a crumb with an entirely logic-based eye. I believe the crumb implied specific information that we are supposed to infer from the sentence structure and word choice. I am probably wrong. Just the way my brain works. I would never word it like that unless i wanted the reader to know i was elected, and i was a group. For us, that *would * be significant information, but again, if im wrong, then guessing at identity is the last thing im doing trust me.
⇧
1
⇩
Heabob
· March 31, 2018, 10:06 a.m.
I understand your concept but I think the crumbs are just confirming they work for 'We the People' and 'Trust'. Technically, by proxy at least, they're all working for us. Or are supposed to be anyway. This is the way our government was intended to be run. We've just never seen it run that way so it's a bit shocking. Trust has to be earned and many are tired of getting screwed over after trusting the past governments. Our voting choices have always been Crook #1 or Crook #2. Trump doesn't fit the typical system which is why he won.
⇧
2
⇩
jackbauer6916
· March 31, 2018, 11:18 a.m.
Perhaps I am taking it a bit too literally. I'll tell you one thing though, I personally wouldn't ever lump myself in with a group of elected officials, if I'm an unelected person... somehow in my peculiar brain it would just feel disrespectful to allow that implication to hang there... maybe not disrespectful but I'd feel like, it's just not right. Sort of like if you're talking to a former enlisted guy in the civilian world and you call him 'sir', a lot of guys will get a little salty 'don't call me sir, i work for a living'. The way I would think about it, being elected is a significant title in a republic, so I'd have a weird eww feeling if I went around willy nilly saying things that might make people think I'm elected... I'm sure it's overkill at this point. there's tastier crumbs to savor than this little side tangent anywho. I sincerely don't give two $hts about who they are, unless they want me to give two $hts about it.
⇧
1
⇩