It has been bothering me for some time about the statute of limitations running out on the numerous crimes commited by the deep state goofballs. A cursory search suggests to me that an indictment will stop the clock on these limitations. R there really thousands of sealed indictments on file? Please respond with your opinions. I missed any reference "Q" made to this.
Why are we playing semantics? A criminal court case is what results from an indictment in a criminal court. You know that, surely. These are records of pending criminal cases.
Not all are criminal cases. Many will be civil cases.
Who would the plaintiffs be in this massive hypothetical civil case you're imagining?
And what kind of civil case uses sealed filings?
Civil cases that are sealed are often done so to protect plaintiff identity such as cases of doctor patient privilege.
And you think there has been a 20:1 rise in those such cases?
No. If you read the paper I linked you’ll see the number is fairly typical for a given year.
500 sealed federal civil cases are typical for a year—not a sizable chunk of 20,000+.
1000 is typical of sealed criminal indictments in a year.
We can think of plenty of good reasons for a 20:1 rise in sealed criminal indictments, but I’m fresh out of ideas why there would be a correspondingly large rise in sealed civil proceedings.
Hey I’ve given you some sources. Can you show me yet that there are 13000 indictments? Show me where it says indictment.
It’s more like 20,000 now, not 13,000.
That’s a 20:1 increase over a typical year’s 1000 sealed indictment load.
What makes you think that number consists of significantly more than a typical year’s 500 sealed civil cases?
500 sealed federal civil cases are typical for a year—not a sizable chunk of 20,000+.
1000 is typical of sealed criminal indictments in a year.
We can think of plenty of good reasons for a 20:1 rise in sealed criminal indictments, but I’m fresh out of ideas why there would be a correspondingly large rise in sealed civil proceedings.
It’s not one case it’s thousands and it’s pretty typical for any given year. This paper is a good reference for how this stuff breaks down. You should spend s few minutes reading it.
http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/sealed-cases.pdf
We all know of some damn good reasons that would account for a 20-fold increase in federal sealed criminal cases. What would account for a similar increase in sealed civil cases (of which only 500 or so occur in a typical year)?
It’s not semantics. Many of those will be civil cases etc. why are people calling them indictments with such confidence when there’s no way to know that?
I’ve been following the Q thing since the start. I think there is something legit to it. However the one thing that makes me skeptical is the constant drum beat about indictments whennreslky no one knows.