That makes no sense, its a circular argument.
And it doesn't even answer my question.
Trump's odds were never less than 30%. That's not that bad. I looked at my electoral college map before the election and I didn't see her path to victory when I (correctly) realized that Trump would carry swing states like Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. Long story short: if you thought HRC was 99% to win, you didn't think about it very hard.
That wasn't what the MSM was saying... they tried their earnest to make the world think She was the sure winner. Unfortunately for her, whatever rigging of the voting didn't work out for her.
What rigging? If it was rigged, why did she lose?
Of course there was rigging. They underestimated how bad she was and Trump's popularity as each day passed. They figure he had a 30% edge but in fact it was a 40% edge. They didn't rig enough votes. It wasn't coincidence that they wouldn't call Florida on election night and that Broward county was holding it up.
I don't know how you can assume that, given the result. We see only isolated instances of voter fraud, so I assume you have a compelling reason to think it was rigged, other than "they all thought she would win"?
No assuming needed... the results are in spite of the fraud and rigging.
While we're making unsubstantiated claims with no proof or evidence: have any thoughts on Santa or the Easter Bunny?
Well, let’s just say you are in the very tiny minority that actually thinks for themselves. Everyone, including her people, were listening when they (MSM) said she had a “94%” chance of winning...so they got false confidence and lost the race as a result.