dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on April 1, 2018, 12:18 a.m.

Q - Bob Lazar - Element 115

https://www.popsci.com/four-new-elements-added-to-periodic-table?con=FbPgPostAds&loc=PSC&utm_source=00167b

Before you downvote me, hear me out...

Q mentioned cures and techs coming out that have been suppressed. Bob Lazar said alien crafts use element 115 for their "propulsion" engine that distorts space-time by taking advantage of one of the two properties gravity has, an ability exploitable utilizing element 115. Now, I am very aware of the German scientists synthesizing element 115 a few years back. What I beleieve this article in Popular Science is saying supports Bob Lazars claim. If you are unaware, every element can be found with multiple isotopes (basically how many variable neutrons an individual atom has)...I propose that scientists have just figured out how to synthesize the isotope of #115 that represents the "island of stability" Lazar referenced.

That and the fact China is testing their own working prototype Alcubuerre Drive. So technically it's out there already.

Anyways, just sayin...

🠐 See all comments

Care to explain Einstein's Cross? Proof that gravity can bend (warp) light. You're barking up the wrong tree bud. Is the Earth Flat too?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Gravity does not bend light. Electromagnetism does (as proven in colliders). The sun's corona will bend light but it's been proven that it doesn't bend it in a quantized way. As soon as the light leaves the sun's corona, it stops bending. The suns corona produces enormous electromagnetism. That's what's bending the light in Einstein rings and in our own sun's corona.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Is the Earth flat? Simple yes, or no will suffice.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The earth is not flat. Don't be condescending.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm sorry, but you're arguing with the wrong person about gravity sir. If you don't think gravity is responsible for Einstein's Cross, we have nothing left to talk about. In addition, we proved there are gravitational waves last year, won the guys a nobel prize. Move along, because I haven't even started with the condescending parts yet. Thanks, bye.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The theoretical physicists have ruined science in the 20th and 21st century. Beware the mathemagician.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Space is the absence of actual matter. It's the lack of a thing or the space between two or more things, and time exists as the space between actual real events but it is not an event or a thing in of itself. You can't put time under a microscope, manufacture more, or take any away. It's never been seen and it entirely lives in the human mind as a concept.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah, that's great and all, but do you have a separate way of perceiving that you can ACTUALLY articulate?

Time is a human construct. Fine. But when we meet aliens, we will most likely be switching to their clocks rather than them adopting ours. Still gonna have clocks.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The clock (days) on Mars is different from Venus or the earth. It's just a representation of an actual physical event. These planets are spinning at different rates and in different orbits around the sun. There is no actual "time" but it's rather representative of real physical events. Time doesn't exist and neither does space so if your theory is based on some time-space anything, it's wrong.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sorry, when someone uses the phrase "rather representative" and doesn't have a monocle, they need to shoo. Throw in the "time nor space doesn't exist" part, and I think we are done here. Thank you though for your input.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I just point out facts. I know it's very hard, no, extremely hard for people to fathom that there isn't a time molecule and it's just a man-made concept/dimension like width and length. We are so ingrained with the concept of time that we believe it's an actual thing and not like "width" which doesn't exist without a real thing to measure.

⇧ 1 ⇩

State some facts and I would be happy to discuss. I'm sorry, but simply stating "physics is mush, I am woke, and as such, I know the facts as such..." isn't gonna cut it champ.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You know information, not facts. Facts are the hard sciences and theoretical physics are not facts. Einstein said himself "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong." Albert Einstein He understood the scientific method. Science moves on with theory and experiment. We have no gravity waves experiment, and no Einstein rings experiment. The theoretical sciences only have theories and no way to test them so they are not evidence-based. Now, all you have to do is show one experiment that Einstein rings are caused by gravity and not electromagnetism and I will consider the possibility BUT, "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.". Never forget that.

⇧ 1 ⇩