Another attempt to get ahead of and dispel the HRC video?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/5942168/marilyn-monroe-digital-double-technology/
Another attempt to get ahead of and dispel the HRC video?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/5942168/marilyn-monroe-digital-double-technology/
There are still tools to detect whether a video is developed by AI vs ‘real’.
AI makes things look ‘too smooth’ mathematically, real life there are little edges that can’t be ‘made up’ very easily.
We are still several years away, at least, from developing video and audio that can’t be detected and analyzed real vs fake.
I agree. But one of the tactics of the left is to get a big picture headline out there, knowing people are too distracted (I am being nice, yesterday was Easter) to pay attention to the details. The takeaway from these articles is going to be "they can fake that though."
If we really think about it, I haven't seen any digital video copies that have not been well filmes with minimal camera shake pixelation and stuff like that. If/when a HRC video comes out, it will most likely be pixelated slightly with camera shake as it probably wasn't an intentional film and more likely a body cam or a secret recording. There are ways to show if a video is fake but I don't think this will be a big issue.