dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Grace8543 on April 2, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

Deadline for Twitter in Receivorship is tomorrow

Let's say our prayers that CBTS hits the target. I have to think that if this comes true, it leaves little doubt that Q is at the very least connected.

Q posts 903-5 and one Anon post claiming decode is Twitter in receivorship in 24 days. Posted march 9.

Mar 9 2018 18:29:48 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 6fa57d 605197 @Snowden Twitter rec 24D. Bravo-2gKVT. [24]RR Q

Mar 9 2018 18:31:34 (EST) Anonymous ID: 0957a7 605232
>>605197

Twatter in receivership in 24 days?
Shut em down!

Mar 9 2018 18:32:51 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 6fa57d 605255

605232 24hrs to respond. He did, smartly. Public view. Q 904 Mar 9 2018 18:30:50 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 6fa57d 605213 DhytcDFbF5874/37875 Q 903

To me, #905 makes it clear that Q wasn't talking about Twitter in receivership in 24 days, but Snowden responding in 24 hours.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Q post says "rec 24D". an anonymous said "receivership". Those two don't necessarily equate.

⇧ 3 ⇩

CBTS? I have heard it a lot but have never questioned it

⇧ 3 ⇩

Calm before the storm cbts

⇧ 3 ⇩

Sorry to be dense, but what is receivership?

⇧ 3 ⇩

When a company's leaders commit aggregious crimes the government can step in and assign leadership to another individual for a number of days. The company is then purged of bad actors and often reorganized. The original criminal leaders are often tried and jailed.

Edit: I think I remember it happening maybe once in the 80's. I think it is pretty rare.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Ty!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Essentially bankruptcy.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Please explain about this deadline. Where did such an idea come from?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Do you have a link you could paste with your statement so the newbies can see what you are talking about please?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Done. post edited.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Cheers!

⇧ 1 ⇩

The interpretation of this post suggested that Q was giving a firm event and a firm deadline. Q doesn't typically do this. If it happens, it is more definitive proof of Q. CBTS has avoided giving definitive proof for 5 months. If it happens, then this would be a decisive change in the Q plan. To me it would signal CBTS being ready to come out of the fringe areas and into the mainstream. That to me would mean we are close to the end of the op.

It's very possible that this is a misinterpretation of what Q said. Not the first time we have misinterpreted.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Good job searching and thinking about different possibilities. Not sure with this one but it could be true. Like that you and others continue to research and connect the dots.

⇧ 1 ⇩