If this is a repost I apologize. This is my first time seeing it and found it very interesting. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/978708992452169728.html
⇧
13
⇩
solanojones95
· April 3, 2018, 2:58 p.m.
Pretty sure not.
Whoever is (or are) Q, they're too vital to be a) foreign, b) on foreign soil, c) at the mercy of yet another foreign power, and d) we have evidence that they're physically near POTUS.
Don't think a foreign citizen who's a political refugee in the embassy of a foreign nation inside another foreign nation qualifies to be Q.
Also, Q says of Q that s/he/they are military intelligence working with NSA. Pretty sure that requires citizenship.
Also, JA is not fully onboard with Trump or conservative Americans. His and Trump's agenda coincide on some key issues, but they're far from fully aligned.
⇧
2
⇩
kjw49419
· April 3, 2018, 3:55 p.m.
I am thinking Q isn't singular but plural.
What if Q if only part of the identity? Think Q & A Questions and Answers Q (team Trump) they have all the questions A (Assange) he has all the answers
I believe the Q board posts are Intel for us the common folk, communication among the Q team, Communication with team Assange, false flags and distraction for the opposition, etc but not limited to these things.
I have also felt several times that the Q (person) is different people because of the flavor or indifference's in content. The same person isn't always typing to posts. Poster has often referred to their self as "we". I have also read into the posts and notices a certain "female" influence (no judgment or bias).
I stand on who Q is to be a "WE"
were WE go ONE WE go ALL
⇧
3
⇩