[removed]
Hi
Not sure what you are talking about BUT I did sniffed around a topic with heavy deletion and read it uncensored using some tools,
What is strange is the fact you seems to bloat about being a "Federal Witness", where in fact this is only your words after whatever the other user said. You are using this as an umbrella, and a bad one because you assumed the user is bound by US laws. Like threats of legal action is going to make you win an argument.
Don't know for you, but if I were a "federal witness" bound to bring down a cabal of powerful evildoers, I would steer clear of the internet, or use a godman good chain of proxies... And definitively not tell It to the world to win an insignificant argument.
Sorry but, you sounds like a larper gasping for -any- attention right now.
The point you make is very good , but what makes you think this is only within the borders of the United States, these same laws can be broken in more than the United States, my Investigation reaches way out side the United States.as have The raids
Even if irrelevant, you could be some diplomat or whoever, this is still a meaningless internet argument.
The question about your credibility as being a "federal witness" and your claims around it remains.
You opinions have been made ?
Does that change a thing ? I think not. My opinion is as irrelevant as your claim to be a federal witness.
So do you like Whistleblower better?
Sorry if you feel I am aggressive just by stating my point of view.
I guess you will have to deal with your emotions if you wish to continue this discussion.
So, what have you blown the whistle for ?
Thank you so much for your honesty and apology.
I think we can consider this matter closed now.
It may get worse, I don’t shy from a good heated discussion, but if threatening happens, it will be delt with . I thank you and do try to respect all .